Výkonný výnos – Rada pro odolnost dodavatelského řetězce při Bílém domě a bezpečnost amerického dodavatelského řetězce

Launch a 90-day data-sharing framework among related organizations within the industry to map last-mile vulnerabilities in processing networks; prioritize projects that extinguished risk; improve visibility for procurement and manufacturing sectors. This baseline enables targeted investments; a unified workforce alignment across agencies will be possible, elevating line-level capability.

Meaning of the framework rests on consolidating data sources; standardizing metrics; aligning them with national safety goals; in tribal areas, the plan directs targeted projects to move workers toward territorial hubs along the line of operations, reducing gaps in service delivery while extinguishing critical bottlenecks.

First steps begin with legislative-year allocations; investing in processing facilities, training pipelines, modern data-sharing platforms; necessary funding supports this, reducing equity gaps by prioritizing high-need areas, including tribal communities, then expanding coverage to additional portions of the network.

Key metrics encompass workforce participation, geographic reach, project completion rates, cost efficiency; part of the measure targets reducing disparities by concentrating resources where they are most needed, with emphasis on territorial balance and meaningful work opportunities for local workers.

Závěr: The plan emphasizes investing in human capital, strengthening continuity of essential operations, plus ensuring transparent reporting; as a result, last-mile reliability improves, projects reach fruition, equity gains for workers in high-risk areas rise across the legislative year.

Executive Order Framework for Federal Action on Supply Chain Resilience and Security

Recommendation: enact a legislative framework that standardizes risk reporting and supplier diversification across sectors to strengthen the logistics network against cyber-attacks.

Launch a biennial summit to align industry leaders, states, and countrys with allies, because reducing reliance on single providers requires coordinated actions to improve continuity, safety, and impact.

Coordinate with apnsa to identify critical nodes in manufacturing and ocean logistics sector and to serve essential operations; implement protective controls that limit impact on emergency operations and normal activities.

Create a senior-level task force to continue to support the president, coordinating with organizations and allies to keep momentum, monitor impact, and sustain future capabilities.

Develop a continuous improvement program to keep progress measured at multiple levels and at the level of critical facilities, with ongoing cooperation among stakeholders, and ensuring diverse suppliers and safety standards become standard practice.

Define Council Roles, Membership, and Decision Rights

First, appoint a chair from the public sector with cross-industry credibility to steer agendas, coordinate responses across actors, and authorize rapid actions during cyber-attacks. The chair would lead quarterly reviews and ensure minutes are published in the applicable section within 48 hours after each meeting.

Membership framework: The panel would bring together aluminum producers, steel mills, electronics manufacturers, ports authorities, dockworkers, labor unions, shippers and freight forwarders, carriers, and financial partners. Include cyber risk specialists and incident responders, with participation from federal and state partners to ensure American interests are represented. Their diverse perspectives would improve react timing and data reliability, because last year’s events showed how malicious actors exploited gaps at ports and within time-sensitive logistics windows. Russian actors would be monitored as part of ongoing risk awareness.

Decision rights: Routine operational choices require a simple majority to approve; strategic policies and multi-year budgets demand a two‑thirds vote. In time-critical scenarios tied to cyber-attacks or major disruptions, the chair may authorize interim actions for up to 72 hours, after which the full panel must confirm a longer-term plan. All decisions and actions would be documented in the section and shared with the united community within 24 hours of approval.

Beginning and review cycle: Launch a six-month pilot across key ports and inland hubs, with a target investment of up to $1.2 billion to modernize information-sharing, alerting, and response protocols. Key metrics include port throughput, hundred-million-dollar impacts avoided, and dockworkers’ participation rates, alongside time-to-detect and time-to-restore for cyber-attacks. The first milestone is a formal review at the three-month mark to decide whether to continue, expand, or recalibrate approaches.

Keep focus on applicable outcomes: Maintain clear lines of accountability, ensure reliable data feeds, and begin with a concrete section-by-section plan that covers governance, escalation paths, and reporting cadence. Your organization would bring expertise from industry segments, the united summit would align public and private priorities, and american stakeholders would ensure domestic resilience against malicious incursions while continuing to attract private investment and maintain momentum in a rapidly changing environment.

Identify High-Risk Sectors and Data Gaps for Resilience Planning

Recommendation: Immediately establish a 60-day sector risk map using a standardized data model across ministries, industry associations, and operators; enlist senior officials to identify critical gaps and launch a central dashboard to inform response planning.

Prioritized sectors include industrial manufacturing, energy generation, transportation networks, chemical processing, food and agriculture value chains, information technology, and essential retail logistics. Key risk drivers are single-source suppliers, long transoceanic routes, climate exposure, port congestion, and dependence on carriers across countries; map exposure by country, route, mode, and processing stage to quantify days of disruption and potential impact on business revenue.

Data gaps hamper accurate planning; however, the most persistent gaps are real-time visibility into carrier schedules and inland flows, timely port and border processing metrics, supplier tier information, and incident reporting across countries. Additional blind spots include cost structures (fees and duties), capacity vs demand curves, and lack of standardized data formats across offices and associations.

Evidence from research and analyses across the world highlights the need for stronger data-sharing mechanisms. Leverage industry association networks and country office reports to benchmark risk profiles and identify high-risk corridors. Use the general framework to help their teams coordinate to protect operations and serve stakeholders.

Actions to close gaps: invest in a standardized data-sharing framework; appoint a dedicated office lead; set a 12-week cadence for refreshing inputs; implement a risk indicator set with metrics such as visibility score, timeliness, accuracy, and completeness. Track costs and fees, ensure appropriate governance and privacy controls, and align with sustainability targets to avoid excessive burden on business partners.

Key metrics to monitor include days of downtime, recovery time, carrier reliability, processing throughput, and coverage across countries. Use a general risk index and a continuous improvement loop to serve industry needs and protect critical functions.

Implementation timeline and ownership: form an office-led working group under the ministry; define responsibilities; publish quarterly briefs; require carriers to report on capacity and disruptions; track days of disruption and recovery progress; identify most at-risk routes and sectors for targeted support.

Agency Requirements: Risk Assessments, Continuity Plans, and Supplier Transparency

Recommendation: Implement a nationwide, standardized risk assessment framework to identify high-exposure vendors, processing sites, and transportation nodes. Define a risk basis with categories for health, environmental factors, cyber threats, and operational disruption; classify affected assets by likelihood and impact, and require defined scoring and documentation. Establish a review cadence that continues through full-scale events, with quarterly reporting to the president’s office and related associations. Steps include mapping dependencies, quantifying exposure, conducting on-site verification, and establishing a central data repository for ongoing review across sections.

Continuity planning should translate risk findings into actionable measures. Steps: map critical flows and processing steps; set minimum service levels; identify alternative vendors and routing options; codify triggers and escalation paths. Invite cross-sector participation through the association and regional offices; advance capability by incorporating environmental health considerations; align with defined objectives; pursue forward-looking measures that reduce downtime and protect health while coordinating with tribal partners around nationwide operations.

Transparency of supplier information requires a structured disclosure framework. Build a baseline profile including ownership, geographic footprint, processing capacity, critical dependencies, and environmental risk indicators. Require inviting suppliers to disclose information and to validate data via on-site review or third-party assessment; connect data to performance metrics; maintain nationwide visibility while protecting sensitive information. Extend engagement to tribal entities and Angola to demonstrate scalability; define the extent of exposure and steps to reduce risk using the association framework; assign an assistant to monitor compliance and progress within each section of the program.

Public-Private Information Sharing: Mechanisms, Dashboards, and Privacy

Begin by establishing a cross-sector data-exchange protocol; legally binding; technically secure; privacy-by-design features to protect individuals’ information.

Many offices shall share processing insights; collective strategy shall bring private actors together; this shall reduce shortfalls.

1. Mechanisms
   • Přímé datové kanály z poboček; zabezpečené kanály; schémata sladěná se stávajícími standardy.
   • Federované dotazy napříč sítěmi; zpracování s ochranou soukromí; žádný centrální přesun nezpracovaných dat.
   • Tokenizované identifikátory; zpracování s oprávněními; auditní stopy.
   • Partnerská rámcová ujednání; úřady, agentury a soukromé subjekty spolupracují prostřednictvím společných výborů.
2. Přehledy
   • Viditelnost v reálném čase; zobrazení podle rolí; geografické filtry; západní region; angola; zambie; metriky zahrnují dobu do detekce, rizikové signály, označené dopravce, doby zpracování.
3. Privacy
   • Minimalizace dat; pseudonymizace; šifrování; přísné kontroly přístupu; limity uchovávání; plán reakce na narušení bezpečnosti; posouzení vlivu na ochranu osobních údajů.
4. Implementation steps
   1. Krok 1 začněte s pilotním programem v západním regionu; Angola; Zambie; dopravci; kanceláře; partneři agentury.
   2. Krok 2: Rozšíření do dalších jurisdikcí; integrace různorodých zdrojů dat; zajištění smyček pro detekci škodlivé aktivity.
   3. Krok 3: kodifikovat správu; navázat partnerství napříč sektory; alokovat financování; sladit se stávající strategií řízení rizik.
5. Metriky
   1. Klíčové metriky: snížení nedostatků; doba odezvy; míra sdílení v sítích; rovné podmínky pro soukromé dopravce; účast kanceláří; doby cyklu.

Závazky ze Zprávy o stavu Unie: Harmonogram, milníky a odpovědnost

Doporučení: zavést pětiletý, meziodvětvový monitorovací rámec se čtvrtletními kontrolami pokroku, nezávislými analýzami a veřejným mechanismem odpovědnosti, kterému předsedá předseda. Tento přístup se zaměřuje na současné slabiny v celém sektoru, včetně kybernetických útoků na kritické systémy a koridoru, kterým se přesouvají nerostné suroviny a další zboží po trasách z pobřeží na pobřeží od západu na východ, s cílem vybudovat odolnou síť, snížit riziko a poskytovat pomocnou podporu agenturám a programům.

Časový plán a časově omezené akce: do 12 měsíců zveřejnit základní analýzy dopadů na příjmy a doby narušení pro hlavní toky; do 24 měsíců zahájit společné programy na posílení systémů a snížení kybernetických útoků; do 36 měsíců sladit poplatky a toky financování, aby se umožnila rychlejší náprava; do 60 měsíců prokázat trvalé zlepšení napříč zeměmi a sektory a poté aktualizovat rozsah prostřednictvím průběžné koordinace západních a východních partnerů.

Milníky: Milník 1: publikována výchozí data; Milník 2: dokončeno první mezirezortní cvičení; Milník 3: úprava trasy koridoru pro zkrácení doby přepravy; Milník 4: integrované monitorovací systémy v provozu; Milník 5: výroční zpráva pro předsedu a agentury s podrobným popisem výsledků a prognózou na další období.

Odpovědnost: zřídit veřejný panel sledovaný předsedou; požadovat dřívější varování před vznikajícími incidenty; nařídit pravidelné audity prováděné nezávislými analýzami; zajistit asistenční podporu pro oblastní kanceláře; propojit výkon s financováním programů a výnosy; zahrnout cvičení pro případ katastrof k otestování připravenosti.

Financování a správa: poplatky vybírané na podporu programů v souladu s cíli; upřednostňovat investice, které snižují ztráty způsobené katastrofami; zajistit, aby analýzy podporované APNSA sloužily jako podklad pro politická rozhodnutí; udržovat koordinaci mezi západem a východem; poskytovat průběžnou podporu k minimalizaci narušení ekonomik zaměřených na nerostné suroviny; umožnit flexibilitu politiky, aby se přizpůsobila měnícím se podmínkám, a poté upravit trajektorii pro trvalé zlepšení.

Výhled: do loňska a dále do budoucna, konvergovat k datově řízenému modelu; publikovat analýzy, které informují rozhodnutí a umožňují průběžné učení; udržet tento přístup v nadcházejících letech; zajistit, aby systém zůstal aktuální a přizpůsobitelný novým hrozbám, přičemž se bude i nadále zaměřovat na cíle snižování narušení a posilování hospodářské činnosti na pobřeží, v koridoru a v zázemí.