EUR

Blog
Mercado de Carga – Resumen del T3 y Perspectivas para el T4Actualización del mercado de flete – Resumen del tercer trimestre y perspectivas para el cuarto">

Actualización del mercado de flete – Resumen del tercer trimestre y perspectivas para el cuarto

Alexandra Blake
por 
Alexandra Blake
9 minutes read
Tendencias en logística
Octubre 24, 2025

Recommendation: lock capacity early; hedge with multi‑modal lanes; price tunes to offset volatility. The need appears as times to ship lengthen; miles accumulate; border crossings tighten; volumes show resilience in core lanes. This approach could stabilize cash flow there; early action sets the stage for Q4.

Q3 data snapshot: throughput rose 5% QoQ; miles logged across core corridors rose; there were mild disruptions; border delays persisted; deliveries show resilience in core lanes; there is a need to adjust times to delivery; times to delivery extended on affected routes; some shipments shut temporarily due to weather; indicators indicate demand there; effective capacity usage remains above baseline; this is against seasonal drift; there is steady demand; disruptions were disruptive in select hubs; this could require policy adjustments; the fastest recovery path favors consumer electronics lanes; gris risk scenario signals potential downside pressure; there are approaches to mitigate; above baseline productivity on core channels; early actions kept pace.

Q4 forecast: volatility remains; disruptive factors could accelerate near border; the fastest path to stability involves diversified routes; delivery windows may tighten early in the quarter; capacity reallocation remains above baseline; gris risk scenario signals potential downside pressure; there is need to keep visibility across networks; there are solid approaches to mitigate this risk: pre‑bookings, cross‑dock hubs, near‑shore sourcing; there is a mild seasonal pullback in some lanes; this supports steering toward guaranteed corridors; there remains the option to shut noncritical routes during peak windows to protect service levels.

Operational guidance: monitor border congestion indicators; keep tender cycles aligned with early‑loading windows; adjust dispatches to minimize dwell time; prioritize high‑miles corridors with steady demand; prepare for mild shifts in demand by shaping capacity buffers; use data‑driven indicators to indicate risk ahead of time; maintain visibility across carriers; consider shutting noncritical routes only when risk surpasses threshold; track shifts against plan to keep service above targets.

Oceania Freight Market Q3 Wrap & Q4 Outlook: Practical Highlights for Shippers

Lock capacity now by advancing bookings for 40-foot containers on the core Oceania corridors, prioritizing longer lead times and customs pre-clearance. Use singapore as a transit hub to stabilize schedules; ensure eligible partners participate in the routing to avoid last‑mile gaps.

  • Q3 metrics snapshot: typically carrier networks tightened capacity, with utilization in the mid-80s to low-90s percent and short‑notice cuts on peak lanes. Transit times were longer by roughly 4–7 days on Australia–Singapore and New Zealand–Asia corridors, while Singapore maintained critical status as a transshipment node.
  • Lanes and hubs to watch: the singapore corridor remains the pivotal bridge for both australian and brazilian flows into the Pacific; canada‑bound business from oceania relies on mid‑month bookings and consolidated sailings. Brazilian origin shipments going to Oceania faced longer feeder legs; 40-foot units continued to dominate bulky, non‑perishable cargoes due to stability and space efficiency.
  • Compliance and documentation: ensure customs information is complete and accurate at origin; eligible shipments should include all required paperwork to reduce detention risk; advance data sharing with customs brokers shortens clearance cycles and mitigates delays.
  • Operational dynamics for Q4: businesses should prepare for ongoing capacity constraints, with some cuts in available space on high‑volume routes. Currently, short booking windows can translate into higher surcharge exposure; shore‑side handling and port congestion remain a critical bottleneck in select hubs.
  • Recommendations for shippers: prioritize each shipment with longer lead times, consolidate where possible, and use multi‑carrier strategies to avoid single‑point failure. first mile coordination should include owner-operators to secure spot space, and international teams should align on advance booking targets.
  • Risk and readiness: challenges include discipline in early planning, variability in ocean schedules, and the need to adjust for customs timelines in canada and brazilian trade flows. created contingency buffers and rate protection should be part of a proactive hedging plan for Q4.

Q3 lane performance: top corridors, capacity gaps, and yield trends

Recommendation: rerouting toward latam corridors with robust demand; lock linehaul capacity on strongest routes; monitor infrastructure uncertainty; prioritize exits to another gateway via ad-hoc adjustments.

Q3 snapshot highlights top corridors by throughput: latam–NA East via Norfolk +9% QoQ; latam–NA West via LAX +12% QoQ; latam–Europe via Rotterdam +7% QoQ; latam–Asia via Singapore +5% QoQ. Yield trajectories surpassing prior quarters according to Q3 data on latam–NA East, latam–Europe; oversupply risk persists in some cross-hemisphere lanes. Infrastructure bottlenecks in countries such as Brazil, Mexico, Chile drive dwell times; uncertainty in regulatory regimes raises challenge to connect inland networks with coastal gateways.

Capacity gaps remain pronounced on high-volume lanes; the belt of chokepoints across ports, rail links, and inland connectors leaves linehaul margins exposed. Blockades near hubs require ad-hoc rerouting to alternate gateways; this elevates labour costs, dwell times, and capital commitment, particularly for routes linked to Norfolk and other belt-connected corridors. Return to balanced utilization stays complicated if exits are delayed, while dwell times climb on congested corridors.

Corridor Q3 Throughput Change Capacity Gap Cambio de rendimiento Key Constraints Recommended Action
LATAM–NA East Coast (Norfolk gateway) +9% 18% +6% blockades; labour shortages; dwell lock in linehaul slots; reroute to another gateway when dwell exceeds threshold; monitor exits
LATAM–NA West Coast (LAX) +12% 22% +7% dwell; border delays; infrastructure bottlenecks expand ad-hoc linehaul slots; connect with Norfolk via secondary routings; adjust schedules to anticipated surges
LATAM–Europe (Rotterdam) +7% 16% +4% infrastructure delays; port congestion; regulatory ambiguity pre-book slots; allocate dedicated capacity; segment shipments by priority
LATAM–Asia (Singapore) +5% 28% +2% long-haul exposure; Suez route risk; fuel costs reduce exposure; utilize alternative transits; build contingency via ad-hoc lanes

Remember: exits, blockades, labour disturbances in LATAM, North Atlantic corridors push dwell times higher; maintain flexibility to reroute; monitor uncertainty, infrastructure bottlenecks, regulatory changes. Returning to steadier levels depends on coordinated connect between inland transport, port operations, and labour availability across countries.

Mitigating port congestion: actionable steps for Q4 planning in Oceania

Mitigating port congestion: actionable steps for Q4 planning in Oceania

Lock berths 4–6 weeks ahead and enter binding multi-port plans to reduce congestion exposure; this preserves production continuity and stabilizes results.

Leverage data from the suez corridor and diversify calls to alternative hubs, including cape routes, to offset adverse delays. Use toronto schedule feeds to align with northbound demand; plan for many scenarios across the horizon, and adjust prior week forecasts to minimize days of missed berths. Maintain resources and account for the need to reallocate capacity if a key commodity faces congestion; the pattern shows commodities like agricultural inputs and energy cargos drive volatility.

To mitigate risk during elections and potential port slowdowns, maintain an adverse-prone buffer equal to 5–10% of planned throughput; this is critical for capex returns; forecast scenarios point to a nearly three-week horizon for rerouting if a port encounters congestion; call carriers early to secure space, and activate alternative berths in nearby ports to keep throughput uninterrupted.

Results from early Q4 pilots show gains in berth utilization and shorter dwell times; by maintaining unchanged coordination across production, supply, and customers, the team can achieve predictable cadence. Track daily metrics, including volume by commodities, vessel entry success, and berth availability. If needs rise, reallocate resources and adjust the plan; the horizon remains bounded by port congestion signals, not by internal constraints.

Q4 demand outlook by sector: retail, resources, and e-commerce in the region

Target southeast retail, northeast channels, e-commerce replenishment immediately; heightened demand in the region requires accelerated inventory turns; rely on real-time orders, robust last-mile capacity, clear sourcing within the quarter. Through hapag-lloyd service offerings, engagement levels rise; here, rearview readouts show transpacific shipments started, with mild lead times.

Retail in southeast remains elevated; number of items within coverage rose 8% versus Q3; case data shows shortages narrowed, yet electronics still show mild gaps; employees declined early Q3, now rising to 85% of pre-crisis levels; promotions through the season support throughput.

Resources sector in northeast shows mixed signals; volumes started to recover with a mild uptick; inventories down slightly relative to target; shortages may appear in raw materials; in some markets sluggish demand persists; transpacific schedules tightened; engagement with buyers strengthened; service levels improved.

E-commerce in the region continues to grow; last-mile capacity remains tight in coastal hubs; throughputs moved faster in southeast where dwell times shortened; read rates improved; engagement with customers increased; service levels rose; carriers like hapag-lloyd offering new e-fulfillment options; through the quarter.

Pricing signals by mode: container vs bulk trends and budgeting implications

Adopte un enfoque de presupuestación de doble vía: fije el espacio de contenedor en las rutas principales durante los próximos seis meses, manteniendo al mismo tiempo un grupo flexible de tarifas a granel.

Las señales de precios de los contenedores muestran una capacidad más ajustada en las rutas del golfo; las importaciones de Vancouver siguen siendo ajustadas. Los factores incluyen la congestión portuaria, las interrupciones marítimas; los volúmenes a través de los corredores mexicanos están disminuyendo.

Los volúmenes de contenedores disminuyeron mes a mes; las mercancías recorren menos kilómetros, las materias primas se están desacelerando, disminuyendo la exposición.

La disciplina operativa es importante: reserve entre 12–15% de contingencia para interrupciones; los precios agrupados deben reflejar la volatilidad mensual, con un período de fijación en los contenedores; reajustes flexibles para grandes volúmenes. Este acuerdo proporcionará claridad a los planificadores. Los movimientos a granel podrían suavizar la volatilidad. Los meses de alto riesgo requieren márgenes de seguridad premium. Este cronograma cumple con los objetivos operativos.

los escenarios de robinson podrían proporcionar métricas rápidas de exposición a precios; las opciones de intervención en el comercio del golfo podrían moderar los picos; los ajustes de servicio en los corredores mexicanos podrían alterar los márgenes.

Cobertura y gestión de costos: cargos por combustible y tácticas de volatilidad de tarifas

Cobertura y gestión de costos: cargos por combustible y tácticas de volatilidad de tarifas

Recomendación: implementar un plan de cobertura disciplinado que cubra entre 60 y 90 días de exposición al recargo de combustible, fijando tipos base y ajustando índices; este paso práctico estabiliza los costos de transporte para las reservas y reduce la presión sobre los márgenes trimestrales, especialmente cuando la volatilidad estacional aumenta normalmente al final del período, con cobertura en todo el corredor.

Las tendencias por corredor muestran que Halifax, Singapur e India tienen perfiles de volatilidad distintos. Las fluctuaciones de tipos observadas se agrupan alrededor de las ventanas de atraque y la congestión temporal del puerto; se observan durante los picos estacionales, normalmente alineados con los ciclos de inventario. Para gestionar la exposición, los compradores pueden estacionar la capacidad no utilizada siempre que sea factible y fijar precios a futuro que reduzcan la presión en las últimas etapas a lo largo de las rutas durante todo el trimestre.

Acciones estratégicas: aprovechar las curvas a futuro, diversificar las ofertas de los proveedores y ejecutar coberturas a corto y largo plazo para limitar los recargos; potencialmente combinar recargos fijos con componentes flotantes para preservar la flexibilidad. Si su equipo de adquisiciones enfrenta presión presupuestaria, utilice licitaciones competitivas para fijar bandas de precios favorables al tiempo que mantiene la capacidad de reaccionar ante nuevas subidas.

Pasos operativos: establecer una única fuente de verdad para la exposición a las tarifas en todas las rutas; cuando aparezcan señales de congestión, reasignar a la capacidad de estacionamiento o rutas alternativas para reducir la presión que ya enfrentan los compradores. Registrar los patrones observados y alertar a los equipos cuando las rutas de Halifax, Singapur o India muestren aumentos anómalos; ajustar las coberturas en consecuencia. Mantenerlos informados con puntos de referencia claros y cambios documentados.