...

EUR

Blog
Six Ways Multi-Carrier Shipping Lowers Parcel Delivery CostsSix Ways Multi-Carrier Shipping Lowers Parcel Delivery Costs">

Six Ways Multi-Carrier Shipping Lowers Parcel Delivery Costs

Alexandra Blake
por 
Alexandra Blake
11 minutes read
Tendencias en logística
Enero 26, 2022

Adopt a multi-carrier strategy now to capture savings across parcels by comparing live rates before labeling each package. For ecommerce shipments, this approach raises service level while cutting transport spend, with typical savings ranging from 5% to 20% depending on volume, destination mix, and carrier promotions.

One specific tactic is rate shopping that surfaces the best option for each package based on destination, delivery window, and total load. You must balance cost with speed to protect customer experience, while this approach improves visibility across accounts and across the entire supply chain. In practice, you will ship via over multiple carriers to capture best rates on each route.

A second approach is smarter routing that distributes shipments to carriers with spare capacity during the day, preventing overage surcharges and reducing exposure. By balancing the workload, you maintain a stable level of service even in peak periods and across different destinations.

Creating a framework of multi-carrier accounts lets you access negotiated rates, promotions, and flexible service options. It also cushions you from a disruption with one carrier and helps you predict costs across packages in other situations, including peak periods.

Before you ship, use data to trim the total number of packages by consolidating orders and choosing appropriate packaging. This reduces handling costs, lowers the load on final-mile networks, and yields savings per shipment for residential addresses.

Sixth, implement a simple, repeatable process to review delivery metrics weekly: per-package costs, carrier performance, and customer feedback. This disciplined approach creates ongoing improvement and helps you stay ahead of other cost pressures in ecommerce. It also gives you clear insights about cost drivers, enabling smarter decisions and more predictable budgets.

Actionable framework for reducing costs while staying compliant across shipping lanes

Actionable framework for reducing costs while staying compliant across shipping lanes

Start with a lane-by-lane cost review and publish a single-page playbook for your teams to follow. Identify which lanes carry the highest surcharge exposure and map them to appropriate tariffs so you can steer shipments to cost-effective alternatives.

  1. Lane profiling and guardrails
    • Collect data on every active lane: volume, average weight, dimensions, destination, service level, and carrier turnaround times.
    • Look for patterns in surcharges and rules that drive costs up–fuel, remote area, dimensional weight, and weekend/holiday fees are common culprits.
    • Set cost targets by lane: expected base-rate reductions of 8–15% and surcharge reductions of 5–12% are achievable with smarter routing and rate-shopping.
    • Center a quick-win plan on high-volume fulfillment lanes first; this is where savings compound quickly and you can demonstrate impact to organizations across the network.
  2. Rules-driven compliance engine
    • Document carrier rules in a central repository and translate them into automated checks that run before shipment labeling.
    • Define gate checks for prohibited routes, maximums on shipment value, and required documentation to avoid delays and fines.
    • Investing in a rules engine helps enforce consistent decisions across lanes and reduces human error, making compliance easy to scale.
  3. Documentation as a living center
    • Build a living center of truth: lane definitions, carrier offerings, surcharge tables, and exception handling procedures all housed in a single documentation hub.
    • Keep the blog-style updates for changes in rules or carrier offerings so teams stay aligned and can react quickly.
    • Consequently, your teams can act with confidence, because each decision references a single source of truth.
  4. Multi-carrier mindset with a single-carrier option
    • For very predictable routes with stable volumes, consolidate to a single-carrier strategy to reduce complexity and negotiation friction.
    • Maintain flexibility by keeping a smarter mix: use multiple carriers for risky lanes, but reserve a strong, well-understood offering from one carrier for high-volume fulfillment.
    • Use pierbridges between carriers and your systems so switching lanes or providers requires minimal operational changes.
  5. Operational cadence and monitoring
    • Set a quarterly review cycle to reassess lane profitability, carrier surcharges, and rules applicability.
    • Track KPIs: landed cost per parcel, on-time delivery rate, documentation error rate, and rate-quote accuracy.
    • Consequence for non-compliance: automatically surface exceptions and assign ownership to organizations responsible for remediation.
  6. Practical actions that move the needle
    • Target 15–30 minute daily checks in the TMS to pre-validate lane routing and flag any rule violations before dispatch.
    • Run pilot with a high-volume fulfillment line to quantify savings from routing changes and surcharge avoidance before scaling.
    • Publish a short, good-read blog post for internal teams detailing the changes, results, and next steps–clear communication accelerates adoption.
    • Offer training on what to look for when evaluating new carrier offerings and how to compare them against your center’s baseline costs.

By combining lane awareness, a rules-driven framework, centralized documentation, and a balanced carrier strategy, you can achieve meaningful cost reductions without compromising compliance across shipping lanes. The approach is very actionable, centers on investing in data and people, and keeps surcharges and penalties from eroding margins. If you stay disciplined about what you measure and how you act, you will see measurable impact quickly and sustain it over time.

Rate-shop by lane and service level across multiple carriers

Begin rate-shop by lane and service level across at least three carriers to lock in savings on every route. Pull quotes for each Origin–Destination pair and tier (Ground, 2-Day, Overnight) from every carrier that serves those lanes. Record the numbers in a single sheet with lane, tier, carrier, base rate, add-ons, and total landed cost.

Convert quotes to per-lane per-service cost by grouping weight bands (for example, 0–1 lb, 1–5 lb, 5–20 lb, 20+ lb) and adding fixed or variable add-ons the carrier applies. Compare the lowest quote to the next-best on each lane to see the spread and the savings.

Identify lanes with high volume and regular service needs. Prioritize those lanes for frequent price pulls, so you capture fresh quotes and avoid outdated numbers.

Automate the workflow: intake, normalization to common weight bands, and a dashboard that flags the best rate and service option per lane. A repeatable approach lets you add new routes or carriers with a few clicks and minimal setup.

Keep quotes fresh by setting a 24-hour refresh window for any lane you ship regularly. If a lane shows a stable delta over several weeks, you may lock in a preferred carrier for that lane and service level while continuing to rate-shop on others.

Example: Lane A (Origin X to Destination Y). Ground: Carrier A $1.50/lb + $10; Carrier B $1.42/lb + $15; Carrier C $1.48/lb + $0. Total for 100 lb: $160, $157, $148. 2-Day: Carrier A $3.50/lb + $20; Carrier B $3.40/lb + $25; Carrier C $3.60/lb + $15. Total: $370, $365, $375. The best choices here are Carrier B for Ground and Carrier B for 2-Day; applying this lane-by-lane view across a portfolio of routes can trim annual spending without sacrificing service.

Document improvements and set targets for each quarter. Tie rate-shop outcomes to procurement decisions: adjust commitments, negotiate rate guarantees for favored lanes, and re-run comparisons after contract changes. This disciplined approach reduces waste and keeps cost per shipment predictable.

Schedule shipments to maximize volume discounts and favorable lanes

Start by batching shipments into weekly blocks for the same origin-destination lanes and cutoffs. Consolidation of 4–6 shipments per lane into a single pickup window could unlock volume discounts of 8–15% with core carriers and reduce handling and pickup charges. Schedule calendars should line up with the carriers’ service maps, prioritizing lanes with strong performance histories. Keep the door-to-door timing consistent to minimize re-handling and backlogs.

Use analytics to identify existing demand and lanes with reliable service levels across the supply chain, then adopt policies as part of the plan to consolidate shipments when the lane score exceeds a threshold. Data-driven decisions help you allocate pickups across days that maximize fill and minimize empty space.

Coordinate with warehouses, suppliers, and customers to align calendars and paperwork. Pre-create shipments in your system, print labels, and schedule pickups that align with door windows; this reduces back-and-forth and down-time.

Implement a mix of single-carrier and consolidation strategies. For high-volume lanes where a single-carrier deal exists, adopt that contract to lock in rate per mile. For other lanes, use consolidation across multiple carriers, leveraging competitive offers to avoid over-reliance on one partner. Use monitoring dashboards to track transit times, rate per parcel, and carrier utilization.

Done right, this approach reduces freight spend and improves predictability. Track metrics like cost per parcel, on-time rate, and average dwell time at doors. Analytics show that shifting 10–15% of shipments to preferred lanes lowers landed cost by mid-single digits to high-teens depending on distance and carrier mix.

Bottom line: schedule shipments with coordination across teams and organizations, adopt policies, and monitor data to identify opportunities for further consolidation and better lanes.

Optimize packaging and dimensional weight to cut chargeable weight

Right-size every package by measuring the product and choosing a box or mailer that fits snugly, so the dimensional weight (L×W×H divided by 139 for most US carriers) tracks the actual weight; this alone often cuts chargeable weight by 20–40% across a SKU mix of small to medium items. For example, a 12×9×6 inch box with a 2 lb item bills at roughly 3.36 lb, while a 10×7×5 inch box clocks at about 2.52 lb.

Adopt a centralized packaging rules library that covers all products, orders, and destinations; this reduces changes during seasonal pushes and ensures consistent DIM usage across shipping lanes. Include country-specific constraints to help teams navigate different limits and avoid overpackaging as rules changed.

For multi-carrier shipping, negotiate with carriers using a single, predictable packaging spec; align sizes so you incur fewer surcharges and gain leverage in negotiations. As youre negotiating rate cards, this approach applies to sending orders to amazon fulfillment centers, brick-and-mortar stores, or cross-border shipments across countries; coordinating sizes reduces waste and speeds handling.

Implementing these changes requires visibility into outcomes; use wisetech to track DIM weight, actual weight, and rate performance by carrier; set a quarterly target to reduce chargeable weight by 15–25% and apply the changes to major SKUs first, then expand to limited product lines. Coordinate with ordering teams to keep packaging aligned as catalogs expand across countries, aiming for savings greater than the baseline.

Consolidate orders and bundle shipments to reduce per-package fees

Start by consolidating orders from the same buyer into a single shipment and bundling items headed to the same locations within a defined pickup window. This practice typically lowers per-package fees by 15–30%, with stronger carrier relationships delivering up to 40% reductions in dense networks.

Consider a daily consolidation period and stand up a dedicated team to support the plan. A practical target is to bundle 3–6 orders that share destinations into one shipment per pickup period. Your online order management system should monitoreo these bundles and flag mismatches that pose risk or indicate opportunities for growth.

Incorporate smarter load optimization: group items by destination locations, pack items into a single carton when possible, and use consistent packaging to minimize handling. This soluciones includes load balancing and smarter routing, which enhances the experience for customers and improves the experiences of those managing the network. источник confirms that bundling reduces handling and line-haul costs when shipments share a pickup period.

Establish clear metrics and monitoreo to track impact: fast reductions in cost per package, total shipments, dwell time, and on-time delivery. Use these insights to adjust consolidation windows and packing rules. With disciplined measurement, you gain predictability during the period and can scale the model across new destinations.

Example: a mid-size retailer handling 120 orders per week across 12 locations shifts to 40 bundled shipments weekly. Per-package fees drop by ~20%, total weekly transport cost falls ~18%, and on-time rate improves by 3–5 percentage points over a 6-week period. This demonstrates immediate growth and creates opportunities to expand consolidation to seasonal peaks and new markets.

Automate compliance checks to prevent surcharges and penalties

Deploy a centralized automated compliance checks module that runs with every shipment to flag misapplied surcharges before billing. Link data from home fulfillment systems, online storefronts, and partner carrier feeds into a single platform; this meeting of data supports optimal decisions and savings. This is based on data drawn from orders across home, fulfillment and online channels.

For multi-carrier operations, define rules that flag issues such as misclassified service levels, oversized packages, or zone-based charges, and adopt corrective actions to minimize risks. This helps reduce last-mile billing issues. During demand spikes, verify address validity, taxability, and billing codes; generally, these checks occur before last-mile processing and could prevent down charges.

Based on economic realities, create a remediation workflow that automatically updates rules after each meeting with a partner and carriers; this allows teams to act quickly and maintain consistency across different platforms. With online dashboards and alerts, teams could review results, adjust rules, and re-run checks before each billing cycle.

Aspecto Implementation detail Beneficio
Data sources Aggregate home, fulfillment, and online data plus carrier feeds into a single platform Reduces related billing issues and improves accuracy
Rule engine Carrier-specific checks for surcharges, dimensional fees, and zone charges Prevents misbilling and saves money
Alerts & remediation Automated flags trigger corrections before submission Minimizes penalties and supports optimal savings
Governance Meeting cadence with partner to review rules and adjust based on new carrier terms Maintains compliance across platforms