Don’t Miss Tomorrow’s Tech Industry News – Your Daily Brief on the Latest Tech Trends

Grab today’s briefing now to act on the latest tech signals shaping your daily decisions and procurement priorities.

In a study across 14 markets, firms plan to spend millions on device refreshes, with efficiency gains averaging 22% after upgrades announced last quarter.

New hardware cycles change the load profile for edge apps, and the components that run on them determine user experience by up to 35% in latency-sensitive workloads. In field trials, engineers test two configurations while sipping a boisson to keep focus steady.

Ghosts of supply delays linger in procurement planning; synovia has announced capacity expansions to cut lead times by 40% for high-demand memory and sensors. Companies that thoroughly test vendor resilience can know which suppliers are able to meet capacity during spikes; this enables benefits across the entire stack.

To act effectively, build a short daily cadence: review two dashboards, confirm top-3 suppliers, and run a 60-minute test cycle on critical routes to ensure load and latency stay within targets. This routine active benefits like predictable procurement lead times and smoother rollout timing.

Story note: in the synovia-driven case, the team cut backlog by millions of dollars in six weeks by aligning procurement plans with vendor capacity, drawn from real-time signals.

Hershey ERP Case Studies, Brand Unification, and Practical Takeaways

Adopt a single, phased Hershey ERP initiative that starts with procurement and inventory planning modules to stabilize supply and demand timing, then expand to optimization across brands within 9–12 months to accelerate turn and simplify customer fulfillment. The plan relies on a clear guide, and teams know what to do as data flows are designed to integrate across all lines.

A cross-brand rollout requires strong governance and a shared data model. The study below shows concrete results from three brand areas and highlights how early wins enable broader coverage.

• Case A: Chocolate & Snack Brands

  • Scope: implement procurement, inventory, and planning modules for the core portfolio, including beverage-related lines.
  • Timeline: 9 months from kickoff.
  • Key outcomes: inventory turns increased from 4.2x to 6.1x; procurement spend reduced by 12%; forecast accuracy improved by 7 percentage points; customer fill rate reached 98%.
  • Lesson: standardize master data, align supplier terms, and enable near-real-time visibility to avoid disruptions during peak demand.
  • Know-how: data governance and a single source of truth support cross-brand decisions.

• Case B: Beverage Portfolio

  • Scope: consolidated demand planning with integrated production planning across five brands and three factories.
  • Timeline: 9–12 months.
  • Key outcomes: on-time delivery improved from 88% to 93%; lead times shortened by 1.5 days; load balancing reduced overtime during peak times by 10–12%.
  • Lesson: invest in a shared forecast model and synchronize data across sites to reduce misalignment between supply and demand.

• Case C: Global Brand Unification

  • Scope: global master data consolidation and standardized demand and inventory planning across regions.
  • Timeline: 12 months to full rollout, with incremental pilots in two regions.
  • Key outcomes: inventory days of supply fell from 42 to 34 days; overall turn rose to 7.2x; load volatility across sites decreased by about 15%.
  • Lesson: implement a single fiscal calendar and aligned costing model to support consistent decision-making.

Practical Takeaways

1. Begin with procurement, inventory planning, and forecasting modules to stabilize core flow before expanding.
2. Investing in data governance and a shared master data set pays off in accuracy and speed across brands.
3. Define timing and milestones with clear ownership to prevent drift across times and teams.
4. Use a cross-brand guide to standardize demand signals, load planning, and optimization rules.
5. Thoroughly test end-to-end runs, including after go-live checks, reduces post-launch issues.
6. Measure impact on customer satisfaction, inventory turns, and load balance to track progress beyond savings.
7. Lessons from many markets show governance strength makes the difference between a pilot and a scalable initiative.

Hershey ERP Horror Story: What Went Wrong and Key Lessons

Start with a disciplined data governance plan and integrate cross-functional teams from manufacturing, supply, and analytics to ensure clean data from day one. Build a single source of truth for master data and ensure the ERP modules can talk to each other without brittle interfaces. Schedule testing across scenarios and lock timing decisions to demand signals, not wishful timelines.

Hershey announced an ERP overhaul to unify procurement, manufacturing, and distribution across brands. The plan relied on a tight timeline, but many factories faced data quality gaps and inconsistent process maps. The implementation introduced new modules that did not align with other manufacturing systems, causing data duplication and slowdowns in operations. The teams are able to share data across functions once master data is clean, but the timing of cutover collapsed under real-world variability. The supply planning logic misread demand in peak periods.

Key lessons focus on governance and incremental integration. Start with a small set of supply chain modules and extend throughout the operation, from planning to fulfillment. Ensure real-time analytics inform each decision and that the resource load is feasible; avoid overcommitting during times of peak demand. Track benefits with concrete measures: cycle time reductions, inventory turns, and on-time delivery rates. Hershey’s case shows that when planning neglects data quality, the expected benefits stay unrealized.

Multiyear ERP Transformation: Projected Savings, Timelines, and Priorities

Begin with a phased ERP transformation by targeting order management, inventory, and financial transactions; integrate these modules and back-end systems to reduce manual work and errors. We thoroughly map data across components and customer records to create a single source of truth that powers forecasting and margin optimization. The program isnt a single go-live; it requires lash coordination across departments, partners, and suppliers. According to timing and milestones, these phases unlock millions in savings when projects move in parallel and align with their strategic priorities. The most impactful wins come from early optimization of order management and inventory processes. This couldnt be achieved without active sponsorship and cross-functional ownership. Target the edge by standardizing governance and fast-cycle pilots.

1. Year 1 – Foundation and core integration: connect order handling, inventory control, and finance, build a shared data model, and standardize interfaces. Achieve measurable reductions in cycle time and error rate; target savings of 5–8 million; establish governance for data, reporting, and change management. Confirm timing with cross-functional teams and lock in the most critical edge points of processing.
2. Year 2 – Expand modules and optimize transactions: add procurement, manufacturing, and customer service modules; consolidate supplier catalogs; optimize order-to-cash flows and pricing rules. Expected incremental savings: 7–12 million; improve margin through better inventory turns and faster reconciliations. Ensure thorough testing and cutover plans are ready.
3. Year 3 – Enterprise-wide optimization and sunset legacy systems: finish integration of all remaining components, close gaps in analytics, and push automation across all transactions. Gains: 6–10 million in annual run-rate improvements; reduce maintenance costs and avoid shadow processes. Finalize training and governance so teams rely on the new platform for decision making.

• Priorities by domain: standardize processes, strengthen data integrity, implement robust change management, and establish risk controls across finance, supply, and sales.
• Data and integration: integrate master data across orders, inventory, customers, and suppliers to ensure accurate forecasting and replenishment. Build connectors that map to legacy systems without disrupting ongoing operations.
• Technology and architecture: select modular software with clear APIs, ensure modular components can be built and replaced over time, and lash change management to the rollout with frequent training and feedback loops.
• Program governance: appoint a PMO with quarterly reviews, align timing with business cycles, and track metrics on cycle times, order accuracy, and customer satisfaction.

Technology as the Catalyst for Unifying Hershey’s Brand Portfolio

Implement a unified data platform across Hershey’s brand portfolio to align products, messaging, and demand planning. From product development to marketing, from supply chains to finance, unite departments on a single data model and a shared set of dashboards to ensure decisions are informed and aligned. That approach delivers many essential benefits and teaches a lesson: failure in one brand signals the need to integrate, not isolate. Build the platform’s core components with discipline: a data lake, a governed catalog, and interoperable analytics modules that cover food categories and order types, so teams from product to sales execute with consistent data. It ties together things like product attributes, packaging, and pricing, which reduces friction in customer orders and expands the ability to react to demand across the Hersheys portfolio. This view lets hersheys teams see cross-brand performance in one window.

Implementing several interoperable data systems across marketing, e-commerce, field sales, and retail operations requires carefully defined governance and strong security controls. The aim is to reduce silos and enable seamless data flow from orders to fulfillment, linking demand signals to supply plans. The approach yields more data than customer systems previously carried, telling a story about how orders move across channels and other touchpoints, and enabling rapid action when demand shifts. By consolidating data there, teams avoid duplicative analyses and lay the groundwork for consistent pricing, promotions, and product launches.

Three concrete steps accelerate results: appoint a portfolio data owner and cross-functional council to govern standards; standardize taxonomy and metadata across brands; and deploy a shared analytics layer with dashboards for demand, orders, and performance metrics. These moves establish discipline and clear ownership while keeping teams aligned with the customer-centric goal of delivering consistent experiences. With careful implementation, Hershey’s can shorten cycle times, reduce planning errors, and unlock new growth by treating technology as the backbone for a unified brand portfolio.

Unwrapping Hershey’s $250M Supply Chain Upgrade: Scope, Milestones, and Outcomes

Start with a single recommendation: establish a unified data platform paired with real-time inventory visibility to turn nightmares of stockouts into predictable service. Align across departments, run rigorous testing, and tighten demand signals to shrink lead times and cut waste. The plan executes into measurable improvements across the network.

Scope: The $250M upgrade spans manufacturing, packaging, distribution, and procurement, linking data across multiple sites and manufacturing lines via a cloud-based core. It implements S&OP, demand planning, advanced analytics, and transportation optimization to improve inventory management and sales fulfillment across the network. The upgrade touches many things across the value chain.

Milestones: Phase 1 establishes the data foundation and master data governance; Phase 2 integrates planning, ERP, and WMS modules; Phase 3 pilots automation and testing in select plants; Phase 4 rolls out organisation-wide and tunes the system with feedback from management and other departments. According to the project brief, each phase includes clear go/no-go criteria and happens with minimal disruption to ongoing production.

Outcomes: The plan relies on testing and data-driven decisions to steer the tale behind the upgrade. Projections assume 18–24 months, across 60 sites, with 15 manufacturing lines connected. Expected results include forecast accuracy improving by 12–15 percentage points, on-time delivery rising from about 92% to 96–97%, inventory turns increasing from 4.2x to around 5.8x, stockouts reduced by roughly 30%, and annual operating-cost savings in the range of $22–28 million. Results come from investing across departments and a disciplined set of testing runs, while mitigating failure modes in the supply chain and ensuring data quality across the organisation.

Implementation tips: establish a governance board with management, manufacturing, distribution, and purchasing; align incentives with demand and inventory data; invest in modular components to allow phased scaling; run pilots in two or three sites before full rollout; monitor data quality, testing cycles, and feedback from the organisation to keep the plan on track throughout. Sure, this approach minimizes a lash of delays and keeps risk in check while enabling continuous improvement across departments.

Recommended Reading, Sources, and Practical Next Steps

Start with this concrete move: audit your analytics stack, pick one integrated module to implement this quarter, and run a pilot with a small staff to turn early results into a repeatable process properly. Track the outcomes against clear metrics and align them with what matters for your operations and margin, and carefully document learnings to inform later steps.

salera announced a new analytics capability that complements manugistics workflows and offers tighter data integration across modules. Look for published case studies, vendor white papers, and independent benchmarks that show really tangible improvements in data quality and turnaround times.

Use sources like vendor docs, analyst reports, and customer stories. Take notes on what worked, what didn’t, and how millions of events were processed to yield actionable insights. Given your sector, prioritize projects with clear ROI and measurable impact on data quality and staff productivity.

Next steps: map data flows during current operations, design a pilot that includes data owners and staff, and integrate feedback loops. For each project, define limited scope, required data, and a timeline. If you have millions of events, test how quickly you can compute metrics and share results with stakeholders. Spend resources where it matters now, and plan to spend later if the pilot proves value.

Here’s a tale of two teams: one hesitated and spent more later on rework; the other tied analytics to a small set of modules, integrated data, and improved margin within months. The second group announced gains that were visible across operations.

Read up on case studies from salera and partners that show practical outcomes when analytics support supply planning. Focus on careful data governance and ensure the integration steps are documented and tested before full-scale deployment. Have a clear plan to roll out modules across teams, with milestones and review points to keep things moving.