Centro per le Imprese e i Diritti Umani – Guida pratica per un'impresa responsabile

Begin with a concrete, actionable plan: establish a responsible due-diligence approach for your suppliers and a clear timeline for implementation. The Business and Human Rights Centre recommends starting by mapping the supply chain, identifying meaningful risk in labour abuses, and tying every step to a transparent timeline and explicit ownership. Use a trustworthy источник to anchor your policy, and outline a traduzione of expectations for local teams. A practical plan should include an annual reassessment and a mechanism to measure progress, not just commitments on paper.

Align governance with political will and clear accountability. The centre recommends that boards elected by stakeholders articulate a political will to address abuses without delay. Build a working group with a chair who reports to the executive, and a public note about progress. The traduzione of policy into supplier contracts should be binding, with remedial steps defined and timelines tracked in a shared dashboard, where every milestone is visible to staff and partners.

Put in place practical procedures that work on the ground. Start with a supplier risk assessment that uses a scoring system, then require corrective action plans for any real abuses in labour or safety. Use a simple traduzione of policy obligations into contracts, and a lightweight interface with javascript checks to flag high-risk suppliers in your internal tools. Maintain a living history: keep a timeline of actions, evidence, and outcomes to show progress to auditors and customers.

In the field, collect credible sources like worker testimonies, NGO reports, and official data. Ensure the team records data provenance and uses a timeline to plot progress against targets. Recognize that abuses can occur in intermediate tiers; require traceable records from suppliers and their sub-contractors, and demand a response when claims surface.

Empower field teams with a practical plan and clear expectations for suppliers. Provide training, safe channels for reporting abuses, and traduzione of policy into local practice. Build a living working standard that staff can apply daily, and align milestones with governance to demonstrate progress to stakeholders. Keep a record of lessons learned and adjust the policy accordingly, ensuring accountability stays visible and continuous.

Track performance openly and anchor improvements in accessible evidence. Maintain a shared dashboard, publish annual updates, and refresh risk assessments at least once a year. If new political or regulatory developments arise, update the policy promptly and document the changes in your translation notes for the team. Prioritize supplier relationships that show real adjustments and prefer contracts that include remedial timelines and regular audits, with the source material clearly referenced in your notes and calls.

HM says it will ‘phase out’ sourcing from Myanmar suppliers

Pause new sourcing from Myanmar suppliers and implement a phased wind-down with transparent milestones: 3, 6, and 12 months, followed by a 24-month completion target. Publish progress on the site to keep stakeholders informed and accountable.

Review all active contracts and renegotiate terms to minimize disruption for workers; guarantee wage protections and severance where applicable; provide transition support for suppliers to upgrade compliance and move toward a safer, more resilient supply chain.

Install a robust due diligence framework that highlights risks across supply chains, claims of forced labor, and seized goods. Require supplier commitments, monitor audits, and publish findings noted in regular updates to ensure accountability and continuous improvement.

Engage with elected officials, industry associations, and civil society to align on a responsible sourcing standard. Create a clear escalation path for grievances and share a plain-language policy on the website and on the html5 site.

Develop a publicly accessible dashboard showing progress in payroll standards, upgrading of facilities, and cases of non-compliance. This increases transparency about myanmars garment sector and supports the most vulnerable workers.

Promote a gradual shift to alternative suppliers while supporting capacity building. Offer technical assistance to improve working conditions in new suppliers and require fair wage benchmarks to sustain a promotion of human rights throughout the chain.

Monitor trade-offs: cost implications, timelines, and reputational risk; set KPIs and track on the HTML5 site to keep the process transparent for site visitors, investors, and stakeholders alike.

Maintain steadfast commitment to human rights while avoiding abrupt discontinuation that could harm workers. The plan should reflect the most recent guidance and be revisited quarterly, incorporating feedback from garment manufacturers, workers’ representatives, and rights-focused organizations.

Identify and map Myanmar suppliers by risk and criticality

Use a two-axis risk–criticality scheme to map Myanmar suppliers now, placing each supplier into a cell of a simple matrix. Assign risk by factors such as noted violations, governance indicators, worker conditions, and exposure to political risk under the junta. Classify criticality by the product line (garment vs non-garment) and the supplier’s share of total trade with your business. For myanmars, focus on garment factories where volume is high and site conditions are sensitive. industriall networks and local stakeholders would help calibrate the rubric, and you would hear from experts told us this approach would help youd prioritize actions.

Gather data from supplier assessments, site visits, public disclosures, and third-party due diligence. Compile into a standard data sheet with fields: owner, location, product category, monthly output, contract size, and remediation timeline. Noted sources include local inspectors, watchdogs, industry associations, and industriall affiliates. Use a video training module to explain reporting expectations to site managers; this helps ensure working conditions are visible to the team and stakeholders. Data increasingly come from supplier audits, worker surveys, and publicly posted disclosures, as trade channels expand and risk signals accumulate in myanmars context.

Map all data on a 3×3 grid that combines risk (low–high) and criticality (low–high). The most critical/high-risk suppliers receive immediate engagement from the owner and procurement lead, while the least critical may be placed on watchlists with minimal oversight. Follow a standard protocol and assign owners for each cluster. Share the map with stakeholders, including workers’ representatives and industriall, to validate view and solicit suggestions. This transparency supports due diligence and aligns with a responsible business approach; the view from partners is that a steady cadence helps prevent backsliding. Use the website hosting the map to publish summaries for escalation and oversight and ensure access controls and data retention are defined by the commission.

Define actions for high-risk, high-criticality suppliers: require corrective action plans, mandate worker-welfare improvements, and schedule on-site audits. Build improvement plans with input from experts and garment buyers. Share a short training video for suppliers on expected standards; require updates to the action plan with a revised timeline. If negotiations stall, consider alternative sourcing while you maintain duty of care. Use a risk-adjusted procurement approach that follows the map and reduces exposure. This approach is supported by stakeholders and industriall guidance; the view from partners is that continuous monitoring reduces violations and improves working conditions in myanmars supply base.

Set a timeline: data collection in week 1–2, mapping in week 3, validation with stakeholders by week 4, and ongoing quarterly refresh. The timeline helps ensure the scheme remains current. The owner leads the process; youd maintain the website with the latest updates and post summaries for stakeholders. The commission monitors progress and notes any violations in reports; the view of experts supports a steady cadence and a guardrail against backsliding. Use the video to share learnings with suppliers and to support continuous improvement.

Measure outcomes by tracking remediation completion rate, risk-score reductions, and garment-category supplier diversification. Utilize a dashboard embedded on the website; provide access to stakeholders with a view-only option; update the video training as changes occur. This approach helps the organization address myanmars supply base responsibly.

Establish a risk-based due diligence process aligned with international standards

Recommendation: Start with a risk-based due diligence framework anchored in international human rights norms and guidance, such as the UN Guiding Principles and OECD guidelines. Define a proportional scope covering all tiers of the supply chain and assign clear responsibilities to governance bodies and management teams.

Define a risk taxonomy and screening: Create a concise taxonomy by product areas, geographies, and potential labor-rights exposures. Use a three-tier risk rating (high, medium, low) and document the rationale for each rating to guide follow-up actions.

Embed into sourcing and product development: Require risk assessment outcomes to influence supplier selection, contract design, and product development decisions. Build these requirements into supplier onboarding checklists and tender criteria.

Assessment and remediation: For high-risk suppliers, require a validated corrective action plan with owner accountability and realistic deadlines. Confirm progress via targeted reviews or re-audits within an agreed cadence.

Worker engagement and remedy: Provide confidential channels for workers to raise concerns and ensure responses address root causes. Document remediation steps and monitor closure rates to close gaps quickly.

Data management: Collect only essential information, anonymize where possible, and maintain records with clear access controls. Use digital dashboards to track progress and trigger escalation when indicators worsen.

Governance and learning: Train procurement teams; set quarterly reviews; keep leadership informed; adjust the risk taxonomy as field data evolve. This drives continuous improvement and accountability across the value chain.

Trasparenza: Publish a concise, evidence-based report on risk management improvements and remediation results, while protecting sensitive information. Engage stakeholders and invite external assurance as appropriate.

Set clear supplier exit criteria and a practical transition plan

Set a binding exit criterion in the supplier code of conduct: if wage or privacy breaches persist after a 30-day remediation window, trigger exit and begin a documented transition.

Develop a transition plan with a phased ramp-down: map all production lines, inventory, and worker redeployment; gradually shift 20% of volume to at least two alternative suppliers each month over four to five months, ensuring continuity of supply for the retailer and fashion lines.

Establish a transition cell: assign a dedicated account manager, define decision rights, and keep a decision log; ensure country-specific regulatory alignment and privacy-by-design in data handling; draw on hautsala-style risk scoring to prioritize actions.

Engage stakeholders: invite unionists, thousands of workers, and local community voices; prepare a call for feedback and publish milestones; consider political factors that could affect the exit process.

Document evidence and sources: require the supplier to provide wage records, safety audits, and privacy controls; cite sources such as Reuters reports and fashion industry assessments; record источник for each claim.

Measure progress with clear metrics: wage compliance rate, privacy incidents, and on-time delivery; report costs and potential impact in the billion-dollar range; assess whether the exit affects thousands of livelihoods, and outline supports for workers, including retraining and wage assistance; monitor how a competitor could fill gaps to maintain consumer trust; youd benefit from a transparent, data-driven approach to decision-making.

Implement ongoing monitoring and verification of supplier practices

Establish a risk-based supplier monitoring plan and a quarterly verification cycle led by a steadfast owner in the purchasing team. Start with a year-long baseline covering critical sites, then expand to full coverage as capacity grows and data improves.

Map the supply chain by group of suppliers, identify high-risk sectors, and set clear, measurable indicators for labour rights, privacy protection, and anti-abuse due diligence. Use inputs from experts, workers’ voices, and site evidence to assess claims or disputes and to guide remediation actions.

Collect data from multiple sources: audits, independent verifications, site visits, and digital evidence such as images and video. Maintain a browser-based dashboard and a secure site for evidence submission; require timestamped, unaltered uploads and metadata to support informed decision-making.

Adopt a mix of announced and unannounced checks, remote monitoring when feasible, and third-party verification. Balance transparency with privacy by limiting access to sensitive personal data and implementing role-based access controls to protect peoples privacy.

Link findings to purchasing decisions and escalation processes. If a site shows persistent issues, trigger corrective action with a defined timeline, supported by experts, and, when needed, a commission-guided remediation plan. Maintain a record of claims, with clear decisions and next steps.

Publish anonymized learnings for the wider industry site to accelerate improvements across trade networks. Engage with groups such as industriall and other stakeholders to stay aligned with the latest guidance and to respond to political and regulatory changes that affect supplier practices.

Communicate disclosure, grievances, and remediation steps to stakeholders

Under a structured process, publish a quarterly, transparent disclosure package and a clear remediation plan on a dedicated, accessible channel in html5 content, so stakeholders can review the process and outcomes.

• Disclosures cover the scope of impacts on people, working conditions, and communities; include numbers and thousands of affected individuals; provide links to content and images that illustrate outcomes; pulling together evidence from investigations to strengthen credibility and ensure the method is reproducible; specify whether findings apply under different sites or regions.
• Grievances establish a simple, multi-language mechanism for claiming remedies; set expected response times; provide a public status tracker; outline what redress looks like and how it scales for thousands of claimants.
• Remediation steps outline concrete actions, assign responsible teams, and provide a timeline; include purchasing and supplier action plans; indicate whether actions address root causes and include preventive measures; reference February cycles to show ongoing progress.
• Governance assigns a responsible owner, aligns with the scheme, and links disclosures to policy updates; publish a year-end summary plus quarterly updates; set a default cadence for transparency that stakeholders can expect and trust.
• Transparency and accessibility require html5 content with images, charts, and plain language; ensure accessibility and provide translations when needed; publish supplements that explain complex findings in clear terms.
• Evidence and validation involve experts; disclose methodology and sources; explain what was found and what remains under review; show how stakeholders can access external reviews and audits.
• External sharing and inclusivity address political and cultural contexts; engage working communities, other stakeholders, and purchasing teams; share learnings to improve practices across operations and supplier relationships; document improvements across sites and schemes to prevent recurrence.

This approach is a giant step toward accountability and trust, demanding consistent updates and concrete actions to protect people and strengthen responsible practices year after year, including February disclosures and ongoing remediation reporting.