€EUR

Blog
What Will Cause the Next Global Recession? Key Triggers & Indicators to WatchWhat Will Cause the Next Global Recession? Key Triggers & Indicators to Watch">

What Will Cause the Next Global Recession? Key Triggers & Indicators to Watch

Alexandra Blake
door 
Alexandra Blake
15 minutes read
Trends in logistiek
September 22, 2025

Act now: secure liquidity buffers and diversify exposure across markets–build a 6‑quarter cash cushion, trim non‑core commitments, and assign clear owners for contingency steps in the office.

Key triggers include policy tightening by major central banks, a sustained yield rise, and widening instability in cross‑border funding. A medium risk is payments stress that can ripple through supply chains; an event shock in a large hub could push banks toward higher capital costs. Analysts cite articles and official foreword from authorities as the источник for this trajectory.

Indicators to watch include the trajectory of economies growth, debt‑service ratios, and surveys like PMIs and consumer confidence. A weakening east region, rising default risk, or a drop in cross‑border capital flows could signal trouble; a flattening or inverted yield curve would reinforce concerns. Look for a projected deterioration in corporate profits and a rise in event risk signals across articles and central‑bank communications.

What to do in practice: map exposure by region, run downside tests that stress a medium scenario, and embed risk alerts in planning cycles; combine human judgment with intelligence insights from kantoor networks, and ensure dashboards reflect policy shifts to inform swift decisions.

Bottom line: near‑term fragility grows as debt loads rise; nearing recession risk, heavily indebted sectors, and problem areas in consumer credit and manufacturing are projected to weigh on growth. Keep a close watch on payments flows and trace data to the источник of the signal for timely action.

Key Triggers & Indicators to Watch

Begin by tracking three indicators daily: the yield curve slope, bank lending standards, and commodity-price momentum. If the curve inverts or credit spreads widen, limit cyclic exposures, raise cash buffers, and prepare hedges–these signals directly warn when risk is building.

Look for gaps in income and wealth that dampen consumer resilience. Monitor wage growth, employment security, and transfer payments; if income growth stalls amid ultralow rates, stable consumer demand erodes and small shocks spread quickly.

Track country debt trajectories and fiscal space. A rising debt load creates a problem for lenders and policymakers. High debt in a major country with limited policy room raises the odds of a credible collapse in confidence; watch for risk transfer to banks and the sovereign-banks loop.

Commodity prices move with global growth and currency swings. A sustained drop in a key commodity or a sharp rally raises input costs for manufacturers and farmers, squeezing margins and raising default risk in the loan book.

Bank health remains a linchpin. Monitor nonperforming loans, capital-adequacy ratios, and liquidity metrics; a bank that fails to absorb losses can trigger a broader credit crunch.

Policy responses matter. Bailouts and backstops can dampen damage, but they carry tradeoffs; keep an eye on the scale of support–even a billion-dollar facility in a fragile country can avert a market freeze if deployed swiftly. The power of policy actions in such moments often determines whether sentiment stabilizes or slides further.

The economist learned from past cycles that leading indicators precede the broader expansion and slowdown. Track credit growth, inflation momentum, and unemployment trends to spot early turning points and adjust exposure in response to policy change.

Beyond standard metrics, look beyond quarterly headlines to longer-run dynamics like logistics and energy flows. Monitor freight, port activity, and energy transmission; policy changes and regulation shifts can reweight risk across sectors and countries.

Action plan for practitioners: diversify across regions, maintain balanced asset allocation, and set explicit thresholds that trigger rebalancing. Power shifts in policy and regulation reshape risk across markets; prepare liquidity lines at banks and keep a cautious stance on leverage to dampen shocks while you preserve upside in a coming expansion.

Household and Corporate Debt Levels as Recession Catalysts

Recommendation: Reduce leverage now by accelerating debt paydown and boosting cash buffers; avoid new, riskier borrowings and prioritize refinancing at fixed rates where possible. This takes pressure off households and firms as debt levels reach elevated territory.

Households have been piling up debt heavily, and debt levels reach the high 60s to high 70s percent of GDP in major economies. In the US, debt levels currently hover around 75-78% of GDP as of 2023-24, with mortgage and student loans driving most of the growth. This creates problems when rates rise, since a larger share of income goes to service debt, and the response path takes demand away from other spending. There are clear reasons for the buildup: easier credit, asset-price gains, and inflows of cheap financing that have persisted for years.

Corporate debt levels have also risen and now sit at roughly 80-110% of GDP in many advanced economies. A portion of this funding relies on derivatives and other hedges, and in some cases at extreme leverage. As rates move higher, debt-service costs escalate, squeezing margins and increasing the risk that some borrowers will be downgraded. When that happens, capital markets tighten and lending conditions become more expensive.

From a prudential view, frtb rules push banks to hold more capital for trading activities, narrowing appetite for leveraged borrowers. This creates gaps between funding needs and credit supply. In the euro area, funding costs have been volatile, while spillovers push instability across borders. If ratings are downgraded, risk premia widen and liquidity can dry up, making the funding environment less stable.

What to watch now for traders: debt-service burdens, the pace of new inflows into credit markets, and the rate of downgrades among indebted firms. Track mortgage originations and refinancing activity, as well as household liquidity; if payment shares rise, households will pull back on consumption. Monitor corporate leverage, bond spreads, and the reach of credit lines across sectors; close attention to potential partial shocks helps anticipate about the next move. The world economy is interconnected, so a slowdown in one region can ripple elsewhere, amplifying volatility.

To hedge exposure, consider allocating a portion of capital to safe assets. Maintain liquidity buffers and diversify funding sources to reduce the risk that a sudden shock closes refinancing windows. Pay attention to euro-denominated funding conditions and the health of banks’ balance sheets as rates stay elevated; if the economy slows, stability can fade and markets may reevaluate risk. For risk-aware investors, a small position in gold ounce can offer diversification when inflation dynamics and debt pressures coincide.

Bottom line: elevated household and corporate debt levels can escalate a recession risk if demand softens and financing costs rise. By tightening balance sheets now, households and firms reduce fragility and improve resilience to shocks that take hold when the world moves from expansion to contraction.

Central Bank Policy Shifts: Rates, QT, and Forward Guidance

Recommendation: Track policy signals now and adjust exposure within 3-6 months. Tilt toward high-quality stock with durable cash flows, and add short-duration bonds or cash buffers to weather a higher-for-longer regime.

Rates stayed higher for longer as inflation retreated slowly; the US federal funds target sits around 5.25-5.50%, with policymakers signaling patience on cuts until inflation sustains near target. This regime keeps real borrowing costs elevated, supporting the dollar and pressuring rate-sensitive growth sectors. Economies with tighter policy are building buffers against shocks, but growth slows in mid-cycle, making a likely soft landing appear uncertain.

Quantitative tightening reduced liquidity as central banks shrink balance sheets. Banks face higher funding costs; liquidity tightness has a material effect on funding and corporate financing. The likely outcome is partial normalization of money markets as runoff progresses, with regional differences in bank funding pressures. This shift made liquidity more expensive for smaller firms and helped restore monetary credibility after excess stimulus.

Forward guidance now uses explicit data dependencies and a higher-for-longer stance. The signal is that policy will stay restrictive until a credible inflation path is achieved. Independence of central banks across economies remains a shield against political cycles, and markets respond to wording tweaks that shift expectations. If guidance shifts to patience or data-dependent timing, stock volatility can stabilize as investors price in a new medium-term baseline.

Analysts note parallels with the reagan-era discipline on inflation, reminding us that credibility matters more than haste. Regional divergences show that some economies face slower growth while others recover, and military tensions or supply shocks can tilt the pace of policy. The space for maneuver depends on how quickly inflation cools and how balanced fiscal policy remains in practice. A misread or delayed response could become a problem for growth and markets.

Signals to watch include wage growth, services inflation, shelter costs, and the pace of QT runoff. A stronger dollar can weigh on exporters, while tighter financial conditions tend to compress stock multiples and raise correlation across markets. Diversification across currencies and regions, along with a tilt to higher-quality, cyclically resilient sectors, helps sustain performance through policy transitions.

Practical steps for portfolios: maintain liquidity buffers, favor short-duration exposure to reduce rate risk, and tilt toward cash-generative sectors with solid balance sheets. Keep an eye on regional policy divergence; where growth stagnates, rotate into sectors with secular demand and quality earnings. For alternative hedges, limit cryptocurrency exposure to a small, risk-tolerant position, and monitor regulatory signals that could change how these assets fit into a broader strategy.

Bank Credit Conditions: Lending Standards, Delinquency, and Loan Growth

Bank Credit Conditions: Lending Standards, Delinquency, and Loan Growth

Recommendation: Tighten underwriting standards now, boost loan-loss reserves by at least 15% of forecast losses, and publish weekly delinquency and sector exposure data to dampen risk into a potential global downturn.

Lending standards have tightened directly across banks globally. Regulators published data showing higher minimum credit scores, stricter DSCR, and lower loan-to-value ratios. The number of approved new loans fell by about 12% year over year in the latest quarter, while risk-based pricing rose by 15-20 basis points on average. These shifts are running through mortgage, auto, SME, and consumer credit sectors, with foreign exposure adding funding pressure in several markets. A cent shift in funding costs–just a few cents–can translate into a meaningful reduction in loan growth if banks do not cushion the effect with capital buffers. Regulation and supervision increasingly require more forward-looking risk assessment, which is associated with better resilience but longer time horizons for earnings to recover. An investor believes disciplined credit management today reduces the probability that a shock occurs.

  • Underwriting discipline: raise minimum credit scores, cap loan-to-value ratios, require stronger DSCR, and embed forward-looking risk indicators into every approval decision.
  • Data and disclosure: publish delinquency rates by sector weekly; monitor exposure to foreign borrowers; track concentrations that could amplify losses during stress.
  • Capital and liquidity: strengthen loan-loss reserves proportionally to observed arrears; maintain robust liquidity coverage; diversify funding to reduce dependence on a single market.
  • Pricing and incentives: adjust pricing to reflect evolving risk; avoid premature easing; use risk-adjusted outlooks to guide new lending.

Delinquency has risen in several sectors as funding conditions tighten and households bear higher debt service costs. The 30-day delinquency rates in consumer credit and auto lending moved up, while early-stage arrears in SME and commercial real estate portfolios widened more noticeably. The five decades of data show that such signals often precede broader credit stress, and the current trajectory raises the odds that the aftermath of any adverse event will be felt for longer globally. Geopolitical conflict can amplify stress on funding and risk-taking, and events–policy shifts, rate moves, or shocks–occur with varying frequency across regions. Investor analyses suggest that if events occur, the burden tends to flow through asset quality first, then spreads into lending activity.

  • Early-warning monitoring: flag when 30- or 60-day delinquencies exceed thresholds; escalate reserves and underwriting constraints accordingly.
  • Collections and restructurings: intensify proactive collections, offer sustainable restructurings where feasible, and avoid forced asset sales that could depress prices.
  • Asset quality review: reassess collateral valuations and risk weights for sectors with rising arrears, especially in foreign currency financing and asset exposures.

Loan growth has slowed as banks tighten risk appetite and regulators push higher capital requirements. In many regions, dominant funding channels face tighter conditions, and about half of new lending now carries higher credit risk than a year ago. Growth varies by sector: housing volumes remain constrained by higher rates, SME lending in uncertain markets remains weak, and cross-border lending sees higher funding costs. Some markets still face problems with nonperforming loans that can linger into the aftermath of a shock. To navigate, banks should run multiple future scenarios, align forecasts with macro paths, and adjust risk limits before a crisis occurs. A cautious investor would emphasize disciplined credit management to protect balance sheets; authorities can support resilience by coordinating capital, liquidity, and disclosure rules. The future profile of credit will hinge on how quickly policy responses stabilize funding markets and how effectively banks manage loss provisions.

Key actions for the near term

  • Implement a quarterly credit health check that includes sector-specific delinquency, LTV, DSCR, and coverage ratios.
  • Strengthen cross-border risk controls and diversify funding to reduce the impact of foreign shocks.
  • Publish transparent dashboards for investors detailing exposure, concentration, and reserves to maintain confidence during uncertain times.
  • Maintain flexible capex and provisioning plans to absorb the next round of adverse market events without forcing abrupt tightening.

Trade Tensions and Global Supply Chain Fragility

Recommendation: Diversify supplier bases and maintain a buffer stock for critical inputs to blunt disruption from new trade measures and port delays.

Split sourcing across regions, including a domestic option where feasible, to reduce dependence on a single country. Build 6–8 weeks of cover for core components and reserve capacity with key manufacturers to limit production stoppages when tariffs or sanctions create shocks.

Indicators to watch: Monitor supplier concentration, transit times, and capacity utilization weekly. If the top 3 sources supply more than 60% of a component, or lead times extend beyond 20 days, trigger a risk review and activate contingency orders.

Track freight rates and exchange-rate moves that affect landed cost. A modest spike in container rates or a 5–10% shift in currency value can lift input costs by a meaningful margin, while pricing or productivity shifts offset the effect.

Adopt dual sourcing for high-risk items and explore nearshoring or regional supply hubs to shorten transit times and improve transparency. Invest in supplier development programs and digital procurement tools to track status, forecast needs, and alert teams when a risk escalates.

Develop scenario planning: simulate a tariff spike, a port congestion event, or a supplier default; quantify impact on output and revenue per product line, and compare options like order splitting, alternative materials, or alternate packaging to maintain service levels in peak weeks.

Bottom line: align financing with risk management, set aside a dedicated contingency fund to cover extra freight, supplier switching costs, and manufacturing downtime during spikes in trade frictions. Measure progress with a simple dashboard that tracks lead times, fill rate, and supplier risk score on a monthly basis.

Asset-Bubble Risks: Real Estate, Equities, and Private Markets

Adopt a risk-first allocation plan that caps inflated exposures across real estate, equities, and private markets, and build robust liquidity buffers; thus you set explicit caps for each asset class and trigger disciplined rebalancing when signals exceed historical thresholds. Institutional advisers can codify these rules into a modular risk dashboard and use scenario-based tests to quantify potential drawdowns. Adoption of this framework by fund boards ensures consistent implementation across teams.

Macro drivers touch all three sectors. financing remains ultralow, and central banks print liquidity, yet policy divergence across eurozone, the US, and sub-saharan markets creates cross-asset spillovers. Regardless of region, better data-sharing tools and timely disclosures improve risk visibility. Demographic shifts, urbanization, and rising rental demand in core cities support real estate income streams, but leverage remains a gating factor, magnifying downside when a trigger hits. The valuation regime has grown profound in complexity as institutional capital, including captive vehicles, chases yield, and private-market activity, raises conflicts with public-market signals.

Real estate risks vary by market: gateway cities show steady cash flow but face refinancing pressure as interest sensitivity grows. Use third-party source data to validate rents and occupancy, limit loan-to-value ratios to 65-75%, and diversify by geography and property type, including eurozone core markets and high-growth sub-saharan projects with favorable demographics. This approach shifts focus to cash flow rather than marked valuations, reducing most downside when a price signal triggers re-pricing.

Equities carry exposure to multiple cycles; favor high-quality firms with durable earnings, strong balance sheets, and resilient pricing power. Limit exposure to crowded momentum themes and use hedges or selective derivatives to manage drawdown risk. Maintain geographic diversification, including eurozone exposure, and monitor forward P/E and earnings visibility. Private markets pose liquidity and valuation risks; require staging of capital calls, built-in reserves, and independent valuation checks. Use advisers to monitor marks against public signals; beware of captive funds and lobby pressures that undermine independent pricing. Finally, implement a structured governance process with clear risk budgets, trigger levels, and quarterly reviews to keep the three asset classes aligned with overall risk appetite.

Sector Key Valuation Signal 2023-2024 Trend (approx.) Risk Controls
Real Estate Cap rates, price-to-rent, occupancy Cap rates tightened by 50-120 bps in gateway markets; rents up 5-15% in prime locales Limit exposure to high-density markets; LTV 65-75%; stress-test for 200bp rent decline and 12-month vacancy shock
Equities Forward P/E multiples, earnings trajectory Multiples elevated vs 5-year avg; earnings growth decelerating in late 2023 Favor quality, diversify across regions including eurozone; use hedges; reduce cyclicals
Private Markets Valuations, dry powder, liquidity windows Dry powder near historic highs; marks rely on illiquid benchmarks Staged capital calls; maintain 12-24 months liquidity; verify marks with independent sources