Comece por comparar as suas capacidades atuais com quatro níveis de maturidade e investigar onde você está hoje. Reúna informações de respondentes de compras, manufatura e logística, e ancore a avaliação em real performance dados em vez de impressões. Use uma concisa paper instrumento e comparar achados com recentes papers e um confiável journal para validar sua visão.
Adote um modelo de quatro dimensões: governança, prontidão de dados, colaboração com fornecedores e responsiveness. Atribuir proprietários para cada área e definir um initial target, such as cutting decision lead times by 20% and improving forecast accuracy by five percentage points. While keeping costs in check, track progress with measurable milestones and align incentives with desenvolvimento.
Use GoRamp para coletar dados, automatizar dashboards e apresentar alertas que guiam a ação towards entrega mais confiável. Assegure demand sinais fluem para fornecedores em tempo real, e testar dois pilotos neste trimestre para aprender como responsiveness afeta os níveis de serviço.
Documente as descobertas em seu journal e compartilhe a chave papers que capturam o que funciona e porquê. Rastrear performance, liste etapas concretas e celebre os primeiros sucessos para reforçar a adoção. O GoRamp suporta o desenvolvimento contínuo desenvolvimento e ajuda as equipes a responder à demanda com clareza e velocidade.
GoRamp Avaliação de Maturidade para Cadeias de Suprimentos Brasileiras: Passos práticos e resultados
Comece com uma linha de base inicial usando uma amostra de fornecedores e locais de fabricação para pontuar a maturidade GoRamp atual em todas as etapas definidas, e então traduza os resultados em um plano de ação prático com metas de desempenho mensuráveis.
Forme uma equipe qualificada e multifuncional que inclua líderes das áreas de suprimento, manufatura e compras. Aplique uma abordagem internacional e baseada em evidências e se apoie em artigos publicados e dados de amostra para definir linhas de base. O que os líderes têm ouvido em círculos da indústria reforça essa abordagem. Colete dados a cada semana durante a extração inicial de dados, e então traduza os resultados em mudanças concretas em toda a cadeia.
Realize uma análise de lacunas em todas as etapas do GoRamp: planejamento, colaboração com fornecedores, logística e execução de manufatura. Identifique problemas e ganhos rápidos, e sugira mudanças concretas em práticas como cartões de pontuação de fornecedores, reposição na linha de produção e visibilidade da demanda. Valide os resultados com uma segunda extração de dados para garantir a validade e servir como um baseline robusto para as metas de melhoria de setembro.
Acompanhe o desempenho com um painel conciso que destaca as principais métricas: entrega no prazo, rendimento de qualidade, giro de inventário e custo para atender. Essa visibilidade é útil para líderes e se correlaciona com tempos de ciclo mais curtos e um fornecimento mais estável, ajudando cadeias brasileiras a reduzir riscos e aumentar a competitividade em mercados internacionais.
A tabela abaixo resume uma progressão prática desde a extração inicial de dados até a maturidade total, com ações de exemplo e resultados esperados.
| Stage | Práticas Essenciais | KPIs / Métricas | Resultados Esperados |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inicial | Coleta de dados de linha de base de 15 a 25 fornecedores; visitas ao local | Integridade dos dados; pontuação de maturidade | Linha de base clara; mudanças priorizadas |
| Evaluate | Análise de lacunas; verificações de prontidão | Número de lacunas preenchidas; tempo de ciclo | Plano de melhoria definido |
| Mudanças Implementadas | Painéis de avaliação de fornecedores; ferramentas de visibilidade | Taxa de entrega no prazo; giro de estoque | Melhora no desempenho; interrupção reduzida |
| Validado | Segunda extração de dados; auditorias entre sites | Validade das pontuações; resultados da auditoria | Classificação de maturidade confiável |
| Estabilizar | Governança de melhoria contínua | Mudança de velocidade; custo para atender | Resilient chains; sustainable savings |
Applying the GoRamp maturity results to Brazilian supply chains translates into concrete actions for september and beyond, with ongoing reviews to keep improvements aligned with manufacturing and automotive sector needs.
Current State Scan: Map processes, data quality, and supplier network

Plan now: map end-to-end processes, verify data quality, and inventory your supplier network. youre team must establish the initial baseline to support prioritisation and maximise quick wins.
Use a lean, focused framework to capture the current state without overburdening teams. Include clear owner roles and concise evidence so you can act fast.
-
Define scope and ownership: identify which processes, data domains, and supplier types to include, and appoint a data manager to govern the effort.
-
Map processes: document process steps, inputs and outputs, handoffs, and key performance indicators. represent results in tables to aid quick comparison and review.
-
Assess data quality: determine critical data elements, and check completeness, accuracy, timeliness, and consistency. use sampling to estimate error rates and indicate indicated gaps that require action.
-
Inventory supplier network: categorize suppliers by type and risk, map spend, lead times, and performance metrics; identify single points of failure and opportunities to diversify.
-
Technology and data sources: list the computer systems and data sources used (ERP, WMS, MES, supplier portals); confirm data lineage and plan integration steps to close gaps.
-
Reactive versus proactive: capture current reactive issues and translate them into prescriptive actions that reduce cycle times and improve reliability.
-
Deliverables and cadence: produce tables with findings, an actionable summary, and a September milestone for alignment with organizations across planning, sourcing, and operations.
investigate gaps with a clear owner map, and assign concrete deadlines to drive progress. this approach maximises clarity for the next phase and supports a faster path to success.
Brazil KPI Benchmark: On-time delivery, inventory turns, and cycle times

this recommendation targets 95% on-time delivery in Brazil within six months by deploying real-time tracking, proactive exception management, and carrier scorecards. This approach is driven by data and built on capability across the supply team. Leaders and managers should focus where bottlenecks occur–from supplier inbound to last-mile distribution–and use questionnaires to capture current capability and readiness. The result is a clear, demand-driven roadmap that guides distribution planning and inventory policy, with input from maryam and the team. this plan suggests quick wins and steady progress, and the path to success becomes concrete for those who act on the data. leaders across functions see this as a chance to improve the supply network.
the data indicate that on-time delivery in Brazil ranges by sector, typically between 80% and 92%, with best-in-class lanes reaching 95% or higher. those results indicate where to focus improvements. Inventory turns for fast-moving consumer goods commonly run 4–6x annually, with durable categories at 2–3x; days of inventory vary from 40 to 120 days, depending on demand volatility and channel mix. Cycle times for domestic distribution stretch 5–10 days, while import cycles reach 20–40 days, driven by customs, supplier lead times, and inland transit. Many organizations report improvement through tighter forecasting, better carrier alignment, and improved ASN accuracy, indicated by pilot results. This benchmark is highly relevant for leaders seeking action in Brazil’s complex distribution network.
Design a 12-week roadmap that blends quick wins with capability growth. First, complete diagnostics using questionnaires to map process times, carrier performance, and inventory policy. Then pilot improvements in three distribution hubs to shrink cycle times and raise on-time delivery. Align demand signals with supplier scheduling to lift turns and adjust safety stock for variability. The result is a clear view of where to invest next, with maryam contributing field insights that help managers prioritize actions. Download the abstract to circulate with leaders and teams to take concrete steps.
Where to invest next: strengthen carrier partnerships with scorecards and quarterly reviews; improve inbound visibility and ASN accuracy; drive cross-dock alignment; set a target to complete 95% of orders within the promised window; measure cadence weekly; share results across teams to ensure relevance; with proper governance, the cycle completes faster in the top lanes. These actions align with this roadmap and indicate a path for those teams chasing quick wins. Each manager owns a short list of actions.
Gap Analysis: Identify governance, process, and systems shortfalls
Create a structured plan to map governance, processes, and systems, and answer three questions to identify gaps. This plan, created for GoRamp initiatives, delivers a governance map, a process heatmap, and a systems data lineage, all within two weeks. The outputs drive targeted recommendations that reduce risk and accelerate improvement across the supply chain.
Governance improvements: codify RACI for core decisions, set escalation paths, and align policies with risk controls. Use three tests to verify readiness: policy-alignment checks, approval-cycle timing, and control-effectiveness evaluations. Each finding informs a set of recommendations and assigns owners, so youre accountable for closing gaps and reducing reliance on single points of failure.
Process gaps: map end-to-end flows across chains–from supplier to customer–and identify three problems that slow time-to-value: long cycle times, data duplication, and manual reconciliations. For each problem, assign an owner, define a target timeline, and specify required data. The result is a prioritized plan that completes tasks and advances towards a more automated, test-driven process.
Systems gaps: audit data flows across ERP, WMS, TMS, and other apps; evaluate data lineage, master data, and integration points. Include a baseline of data quality metrics and a plan to implement automated checks and reconciliation logic. Use statistical analyses to quantify gaps, and run small-scale tests to confirm data completeness and accuracy. The result is an actionable set of changes that reduces time spent on manual checks and strengthens chain reliability.
Analyses and reporting: compile findings with involved stakeholders, summarize risks, and present three recommendations with owners and deadlines. Review results monthly, adjust the plan, and track improving metrics. Avoid Resumo metrics; tie to concrete KPIs. The approach is plan-driven and concrete, with a strategy to reduce errors in chains and raise GoRamp maturity.
Technology Levers with GoRamp: Choose modules to advance maturity
GoRamp suggests starting with the Demand module to consolidate total demand signals across the network, delivering immediate visibility for every node and laying a clear plan for the rest of your GoRamp rollout.
Assessing your current maturity within four dimensions–data quality, process discipline, analytics capability, and collaboration–helps tailor the module mix and set a realistic roadmap.
Recommended sequence: Demand first, then Inventory and Supply Planning, followed by Analytics and Network modules; this approach, minimizing risk and accelerating value.
Exploring different module combinations in a pilot within a single value stream, along with community reviews and journal analyses, helps compare demand accuracy, total cost-to-serve, and service levels.
KPIs to track include demand forecast accuracy, service level adherence, total landed cost, inventory turns, and cycle time; use these across every major product family to refine the roadmap.
Used data sources should be based on ERP, WMS, and supplier portals; ensure data within is cleansed to support improving decisions.
The advantage of modular technology levers with GoRamp is faster decisions, reduced manual effort, and a community-driven plan that adapts to different markets.
First review after 90 days confirms improvements and identifies new modules to explore, keeping the roadmap focused on continuous improvement.
Within your roadmap, allocate milestones for analyses, training, and change management, and keep journal entries to support improving.
Data Architecture for Brazil: Align ERP, WMS, and EDI for real-time insight
Begin with a centralized data fabric that integrates ERP, WMS, and EDI for real-time insight in Brazil. Use a three-layer approach: Source systems, a streaming layer, and a unified analytics store. Ensure youre data remains integrated by a canonical model covering customers, suppliers, products, orders, shipments, and invoices. Synchronize changes across chains so each stage reflects the same truth, enabling forward planning and faster response times. Starting with the beginning of data contracts, assign ownership to the manager and data stewards for ongoing governance.
Define a canonical data model and master data management (MDM) to guarantee consistency as you scale across retail networks and supplier bases. Use real-time connectors to push ERP and WMS events into the streaming layer, then land them in an analytics warehouse. Run on a computer-grade platform with fault tolerance and clear data contracts. This integrated setup will enhance cross-team visibility and decision speed. The result is integrated performance across teams and smoother collaboration between warehouse staff, store teams, and procurement.
Alinhe ERP, WMS e EDI por meio de uma camada de tradução que mapeia conjuntos de transações EDI para entidades e eventos internos. Trate valores ausentes como explícitos, use esquemas com tipagem segura e versiona APIs para minimizar o impacto durante as mudanças. Implemente interfaces orientadas a mensagens que permitam que as alterações fluam entre os sistemas em segundos, para que os gerentes possam ler e agir sobre exceções em tempo quase real. O resultado é uma precisão de estoque aprimorada e um cumprimento mais rápido, o que apoia a coordenação com fornecedores e a satisfação do cliente.
Considerações específicas para o Brasil são importantes: aplique o registro compatível com SPED e NF-e para trilhas de auditoria, garanta a residência de dados no país e aplique o acesso baseado em funções em todas as plataformas. Crie dashboards que respondam a perguntas como qual foi o status mais recente do envio através da cadeia e como alterações nos prazos de fornecedores afetam seu plano futuro. Use processos de revisão contínua com marcos de setembro para verificar a conformidade e o alinhamento com os objetivos de negócios. Isso também inclui orientações claras sobre alterações e propriedade de dados.
Para sua organização, atribua um arquiteto de dados dedicado e um gerente para supervisionar a integração. Planeje em etapas: descoberta e design, integração, estabilização e escala. Em cada etapa, acompanhe as mudanças e complete os marcos para que sua implementação seja concluída no prazo e entregue valor contínuo aos seus clientes, fornecedores e equipes internas. Mantenha um continuous leitura de dashboards e alertas para confirmar o your objetivos permanecem no caminho certo.
Discover Your Supply Chain Maturity with GoRamp">