Mars Achieves 16% Reduction in Supply Chain Emissions While Growing 69%

Recommendation: Set a goal to mirror Mars’ 16% reduction by embedding sbti-aligned supplier assessments and water stewardship across procurement. These steps, applied to grown networks, demonstrate change with societal impact that is both measurable and replicable. The ahead development path is supported by data and positions the company to benefit in the long term while ensuring resilience across the supply base.

Implementation details: target a 16% emissions cut while growing 69% in volume by integrating sbti-aligned supplier requirements, water stewardship, and transparent traceability across tiers. Between the tiers, data flows must be standardized to support similar metrics, allowing teams to respond to changing supplier conditions with speed.

Operational guidance: establish a twix cadence for supplier reviews and quarterly emissions dashboards, ensuring alignment with davies benchmarks and societal goals. Specifically, these changes foster growing capabilities and changing practices across the network, keeping the momentum strong.

Reader takeaway: align internal planning with societal expectations, communicate progress clearly, and push ahead with a program that supports the child generation and future development. These insights offer a practical path for teams seeking to replicate similar outcomes in other sectors, with twix planning between strategy and execution driving real change.

Mars Supply Chain Emissions and Growth: Practical Findings

Recommendation: implement a three-year transition plan that locks in cuts through supplier engagement, with a director-level sponsor and quarterly action reviews.

Mars reduced supply chain emissions by 16% while growing 69% in revenue, with most gains from changes in packaging and logistics, including enhanced modal shifts and route optimization. Focus on eliminating waste and pushing supplier collaboration to new levels, and keep the same customer experience.

Adopt second-generation innovations in packaging and transport, and learn from ecoceres and fonterra practices that link farming and supply chain sustainability. A director will oversee the transition and ensure action moves from pilots to scale, eliminating non-value-added steps and improving supplier support. This aligns goals with commitment to a resilient economy and changing processes.

Implement three-year changes dashboard: monitor transport emissions, packaging weight, supplier compliance, and контента quality of supplier data. Use enhanced data sharing with suppliers, enabling more accurate lifecycle assessment and action-oriented targets. The plan should ensure supply chain resilience while reducing costs and still delivering value.

Most improvements will come from moves to alternative fuels, multimodal transport, and improved inventory planning. The goal is to eliminate unnecessary stock, reduce backhaul, and support small suppliers through training and capital support. This reinforces the commitment and sets a clear path for changing conditions and continued growth without compromising the environment.

What metrics quantify the 16% reduction across the supply chain?

Adopt a single, auditable metric: total CO2e across the supply chain, broken down by scope 1-3 and by stage, with quarterly disclosures. For a baseline of 5 million tonnes, a 16% reduction equals about 0.8 million tonnes of avoided emissions.

Quantify the 16% reduction with concrete measures: reduce methane from beef farming, track biogenic methane from enteric fermentation, and cut fossil-energy use through hydrogen and biomethane transition efforts. Report emissions intensity per kilogram of product and per million USD of revenue. Track deforestation-free sourcing, and monitor how feedstock shifts into lower-emission inputs across processing and logistics. These metrics give insight into which interventions move the needle.

Break out results by product category and geography: beef and dairy lines, plus other SKUs, and by country. Certain countries show faster progress in feed efficiency, fertiliser management, and improved cold-chain logistics. These gains come behind a structured supplier program and require continuous alignment. The Chinese market, labeled китайский here, requires targeted supplier engagement. Mars said the approach is built to scale, ahead of sector peers such as frieslandcampina; when data align with supplier incentives, improvements stack across total emissions.

Ongoing governance and transparency solidify the gains: publish a supplier scorecard, validate data with third-party audits, and provide total and segment-level updates regularly. Here, insight from field teams guides the transition to lower-carbon operations, and the company plans further reductions into 2025 and beyond.

How did Mars achieve 69% growth without increasing emissions?

Adopt a long-term procurement blueprint that ties 69% growth to circulareconomy principles and uses transparent data to prevent emissions from rising that could accompany rapid expansion.

During the period, Mars reported a 16% reduction in supply chain emissions while total volume grew 69%, demonstrating that efficiency and collaboration can outpace growth without extra climate impact.

Actions included route optimization, shipment consolidation, and packaging redesign to cut waste, plus investments in sustainable agriculture programs for ingredients like cocoa. These programs deploy biochar soil amendments to sequester carbon and improve yields, helping the same farms become more resilient under climate stress.

To ensure accountability, Mars deployed trax to capture supplier data in real time, bolstering security and providing verifiable emissions reporting. The same data platform underpins procurement decisions across categories, period after period.

Lead teams partnered with suppliers on climate-smart practices, including fonterra in dairy-related value chains and cocoa producers, aligning everyday procurement decisions with long-term emission goals and sustainable outcomes for farmers and communities.

For others aiming similar results, act now by embedding circulareconomy principles into every procurement choice, setting a period-based emissions target, scaling biochar and regenerative agriculture pilots, and strengthening data security and traceability to report progress openly.

Which logistics practices and technologies drove the reduction (route optimization, modal shifts, energy sourcing)?

Adopt an integrated route optimization platform that uses real-time traffic, weather, and demand signals to cut total miles and emissions while preserving service quality. Run a three-tier planning loop that is reviewed annually by a director, and use the findings to set targets. This heart-driven approach anchors a compelling transition toward green forwarding practices alongside network-wide efficiency gains.

Move a portion of freight from road to rail and barge across the region’s three major corridors, tied to energy sourcing upgrades. Modal shifts reduce road congestion and fuel burn, while investment in intermodal terminals and smart planning expands the forwarding network. Where gains occurred, the modal mix shifted toward rail and water. Demand patterns across the region are changing, driving the need for flexible routing. This view aligns with futureenergy commitments and drives growth in green logistics across farming regions.

Energy sourcing upgrades emphasize green electricity and low-carbon fuels. Manure-derived biogas from regional agriculture facilities powers warehouses and cold rooms, while farming operations feed biomass into the system. Part of the approach links energy sourcing to routing decisions. Latin-inspired optimization models help balance energy and logistics constraints, and digital documentation reduces paper usage alongside freight operations. These changes are reported as a part of a broader sustainability program that supports the region’s green transition.

Real-time telemetry, IoT sensors, and AI-based forecasting push planning toward precision. Innovations in load matching and predictive maintenance reduce wasted miles, and tests with products like snickers demonstrate how smarter forwarding cuts emissions. Across three waves of adoption, the report shows a real, annual improvement in efficiency, with capacity grown while emissions per unit declined.

What roles do suppliers, data sharing, and governance play in sustaining the reduction?

To sustain the 16% reduction, create a shared decarbonization charter with suppliers and a data-sharing framework that keeps progress visible across ecosystems. Attach the charter to contracts so emissions targets are verifiable and performance‑driven.

• Suppliers and partners
  • Create joint decarbonization roadmaps with suppliers and partners, including mining and factories in australia, with annual milestones and clear ownership for each action. This alignment reduces friction and speeds execution.
  • Link incentives to performance by tying contract pricing and renewals to measurable emissions reductions, energy efficiency gains, and green material sourcing. This incentivizes they to pursue continuous improvement.
  • Expand the supplier base to include alternative materials and processes where viable, and require ecoceres collaborations to demonstrate impact and reliability.
  • Establish a supplier code of conduct that integrates climate and safety standards, monitored by a cross‑functional team and governance body.
• Datautbyte
  • Create a standardized data framework for Scope 1–3 emissions, energy use, and logistics, with real‑time updates from factories and suppliers. Use отслеживающих metrics to assess progress and feed a centralized data lake or platform.
  • Implement secure data‑sharing agreements and APIs with role‑based access to protect confidentiality while enabling cross‑partner intelligence. Use insights to identify hotspots and optimization opportunities.
  • Link internal data with external datasets (weather, energy prices) to model climate risk and cost implications, enabling proactive planning in australia and other regions.
  • Provide governance for data quality, lineage, and scorecards to ensure consistency across the ecosystem.
• Governance
  • Form a cross‑functional climate governance board with representation from supply, operations, finance, and legal. Define decision rights, escalation paths, and quarterly reporting to leadership.
  • Define clear performance metrics, targets, and corrective actions; publish a supplier performance scorecard that tracks progress and drives accountability.
  • Integrate risk management for supplier concentration, disruption risk, and climate exposure; require contingency plans and scenario testing.
  • Schedule audits of data quality and supplier compliance to maintain integrity and ongoing improvement.

By aligning suppliers, enabling transparent data sharing, and strengthening governance, the organization can maintain the reduction trajectory, expand green ecosystems, and continue responsible growth.

Where can readers access the latest articles and reports on Mars’ supply chain progress?

Visit Mars’ official newsroom and sustainability hub on the corporate site to access the latest articles and reports. Subscribe to quarterly updates and the annual impact report. The sbti shows progress, including a three-year trajectory with halving emissions and maintained water-use reductions. The platforms present data visuals that incentivize circularity and everyday transition toward a circulareconomy, with the long-term strategy introduced to guide planning and performance.

Look for sections like “Deforestation-free agricultural sourcing”, “hydrogen and fuel substitutions”, and “smart planning”. These items explain how Mars aligns with major sustainability targets and embed circularity in the supply chain. The articles include practical examples from parkin and other analysts, with transparent metrics on performance.

Readers can access the latest articles via Mars’ newsroom archive, the sustainability report portal, and the investor relations site. Each release includes data tables on emissions, water stewardship, and supply-chain performance. For deeper context, consult the accompanying datasets: supplier scorecards, deforestation-free progress, and circularity indicators. sbti shows how incentives correlate with reductions in fuel use and deforestation risk.