€EUR

Blog
Global Study – Leaders Seek Sustainable Pace for Digital TransformationGlobal Study – Leaders Seek Sustainable Pace for Digital Transformation">

Global Study – Leaders Seek Sustainable Pace for Digital Transformation

Alexandra Blake
par 
Alexandra Blake
5 minutes de lecture
Tendances en matière de logistique
novembre 17, 2025

Recommendation: Launch a 12-month, staged investments plan across core functions to ensure transparence and enable rapid learn cycles among senior teams within the company.

Rationale: Across worldwide markets, senior executives are pushing back against sprawling roadmaps, preferring a handful of high-impact pilots that demonstrate greater advantage within months. The approach balances quick wins with sustainable scaling, ensuring doing et learning stay in lockstep.

Operational discipline: Transparency in information flows accelerates decision speed; many companies report faster course corrections after establishing a simple dashboard to track investments et outcomes, avec moitié of the budget directed to the most effective functions.

Capability development: Investments should back digital-native capabilities. The theme blends learning with practice, linking IT or tech units with business functions to accelerate adaptation across the enterprise; cars in legacy industries illustrate how uptake lowers friction when models align with reality.

Momentum sustainment: Stopping momentum risks eroding gains; instead, consolidate the greater advantage by embedding a cross-functional theme that links information, learninget doing across teams, with continued senior sponsorship to ensure momentum worldwide.

Sustainable Pace for Digital Transformation in a Talent-Constrained World

Launch a two-track plan: a core-change program targeting mission-critical tech and processes, with 90-day milestones and measurable outcomes that tie to business value, plus a parallel skills-building track to expand capabilities across the organization.

gartner research highlights a growing talent gap around data, analytics, and operations, creating greater bottlenecks in the largest initiatives where analysts and databases are core.

Organize adaptive, stage-based delivery teams that can rethink processes and develop capabilities and reduce rework; connect business units around common data standards to accelerate value.

Investments in skills, partnerships, and technologies should be paired with measurable outcomes; virtually delivered training programs, hands-on sandboxes, and lean governance reduce time-to-value and enable quicker launches.

Result: an enterprise-wide capability designed to recognize severe talent gaps and fill them with the largest impact by leveraging databases, analytic platforms, and a chain of cross-functional teams; when talent is constrained, the faster path is to deploy ready-made sub-themes and accelerators.

Define a measurable, time-bound portfolio of digital initiatives

Start with an 8–12 item, time-bound portfolio focused on backend optimization, data flows in clouds, and user-facing improvements. Each item includes owner, objective, baseline, target, and 90-day milestones; set a budget cap, assign roles, and publish a quarterly progress snapshot showing status, risks, and next steps.

Analyze candidate initiatives here using a scoring matrix that weighs value, risk, and time-to-value; also prioritize most impactful yet least complex items; below 10 items in initial wave, while allowing adjustments.

Define metrics: deployment speed, cost reductions, user adoption, data quality, and regulatory readiness. Expected gains should be quantified, and progress tracked with live databases, dashboards, realizing benefits.

Assign roles to scientists, workers, and experts; ensure access controls; investing in training; convert paper-based workflows to cloud-enabled processes; pharmaceutical use cases illustrate faster data circulation and decision making.

Address risk with a lean governance rhythm, push decision rights to item owners, and maintain wind through constraints; hard choices may emerge, and if a change reduces impact elsewhere, reallocate resources to largest opportunities.

Seeing early wins, teams adjust backlog, scale high-value items, and move forward with rapid iterations; ensure access to data, technicians, and business users; align with tech priorities and cross-functional needs.

Assess capacity and skill gaps before committing to new programs

Audit capacity and skills across functions before committing to any new program. Build a mapping of current capabilities against needs in the coming 18–24 months, focusing on security, devops, on-premise operations, data handling, and user support. Use objective measures such as proficiency scores, certifications, and completed projects to quantify readiness.

Schedule progress reviews every 6–8 weeks to align with times required to close gaps.

  • Data gathering: Collect input from HR, IT, security, and operations. In each employee entry, record current skill level, time in role, and relevance to planned work.
  • Gap calculation: In each area, compare existing skills with requirements, identify high-risk gaps in devops, security, and on-premise operations.
  • Prioritization: Rank gaps by impact on the upcoming program and by how many employees are affected; select the top 3–5 areas to close first.
  • Resource and governance: Appoint a senior officer to own the plan; establish a cross-functional steering group; set quarterly reviews and an open channel for status updates.
  • Learning plan: Design 4–6 week blocks; include hands-on labs, real-work projects, and shadowing from those with unique skills; align to those areas.
  • Mitigation actions: In on-premise or industrial environments, create a risk plan around security and change management; use a controlled environment to push changes (open testing path) and avoid impacting live systems.
  • Staged path: Use a staged path to avoid a sudden jump in capability; ensure each block builds on the previous one.
  • Scarce skills: Identify unique or scarce skills (e.g., secure software engineering for on-premise stacks) and plan targeted upskilling or external hiring to address them.

Metrics to track readiness include the percentage of workforce with required skills, time to close gaps, rate of completed training, and milestone completion rate. Review results at set intervals and adjust the plan accordingly.

Adopt modular, iterative delivery to maintain momentum

Adopt modular, iterative delivery to maintain momentum

Revise hiring and retention strategies amid workforce migration

Keep critical roles staffed by launching an internal mobility engine: publish an internal job market within 4 weeks, map high-demand competencies to project cycles, and designate investments to upskill via mentor-led sessions and micro-credentials. Track success with quarterly metrics: internal moves rise by 25% year over year, lost productivity due to vacancy shrink by 15% within 12 months, and churn across chains significantly reduced.

Refine hiring by prioritizing industry-specific paths and chains that align with economy shifts; expand the largest talent pools inside the organization, allowing customer-facing teams to influence skill design. Align compensation, benefits, and mobility programs with c-suite sponsorship, moving towards clear career ladders that significantly reduce external hiring, and cutting time-to-market for talent moves. Use analytics to quantify gains, ensuring decisions go beyond gut feel, merely relying on instinct.

Adopt a retention playbook leveraging digitalization to keep pace with a moving talent landscape. Build a digital-native pipeline with industry-specific curricula aligned to customer outcomes, and manage skill relocation across chains to prevent disruption. Maintain a forward-looking cadence by hosting a quarterly webinar and distributing a practical newsletter; share actionable thoughts, impactful case studies, and a roadmap for multi-year investments that keep staff engaged, move forward, and significantly reduce lost knowledge.

Leverage partnerships and outsourcing to fill critical gaps

Start by mapping three gaps in core capabilities and launching a two-part, 90-day trial with vetted providers–one focused on data integration, another on platform modernization. This targeted approach keeps the base on track and avoids repetitive work, delivering measurable progress over time and accelerating changes toward a scalable backbone.

Outsourcing and partnerships enable access across functions among teams, reducing repetitive workloads and accelerating modernization while managing pressure from stakeholders. In pandemic times, access to specialized skills becomes even more critical. Establish a joint operating model with clear SLAs, escalation paths, and a shared roadmap that places dataops at the center of processing and decisioning. This framework can enable rapid decisions and stay aligned with evolving priorities. The model should be adaptive and emphasize governance with the c-suite involvement.

Choose partners that provide access to specialized capabilities beyond internal limits, including data engineering, security, and user-experience modernization. Leverage both nearshore and offshore options to achieve rapid cycle times and cost efficiency, ensuring a sophisticated approach to risk management across locations.

Align incentives so commitment remains strong; this is not merely a procurement exercise but a strategic alignment with what consumers expect. Track success by cycle time improvements, error reductions, user adoption, and revenue impact. Use the outcomes of each trial to move toward broader adoption, while keeping a base of standardized processes that largely automate repetitive tasks.