€EUR

Blog

Maersk Asia Pacific Market Update – May 2025 – APAC Shipping Trends

Alexandra Blake
door 
Alexandra Blake
12 minutes read
Blog
december 04, 2025

Maersk Asia Pacific Market Update - May 2025: APAC Shipping Trends

Lock in mid-may freight contracts now to capitalize on increasing demand and reduce fluctuations. Diversify route calls along the APAC coast and adopt parallel solutions across ports around the mainland to keep the system veerkrachtig.

In mid-may, APAC volumes rose around 3.5% month-on-month, with cargo moving mainly within mainland corridors and coastal routes. Cross-border lanes to Southeast Asia expanded by 4%, and carriers reallocated capacity from underperforming veins, helping the region absorb shocks in the supply chain. Volumes in the key lanes remained strong.

Fluctuations in freight rates and port dwell times persisted, but the trend remained contained. Operators that hedge fuel costs and secure capacity on key corridors reduced risk. federal guidelines and port authorities supported reliability during peak windows around mid-may.

To meet demand, businesses should audit inland links and build a resilient route map. This requires rather flexible arrangements, diversifying across two or more routes and port calls along the coast to create redundancy. Prioritize partnerships with willing carriers and forwarders to keep transit times predictable.

For a practical action plan, leaders should review capacity against forecast by region: mainland China, Japan, Korea, Southeast Asia, Australia, and New Zealand. Align inventory buffers and delivery windows to mid-may projections and prepare for around 6–8 week lead times on major lanes. Focus on combining oplossingen and disciplined cost management to sustain service across the coast and main arteries.

APAC markets continue to show increasing demand amid volatile freight costs. A resilient strategy hinges on data-driven routing, proactive port coordination, and a willing approach to adjust. By maintaining a flexible system and reviewing the route mix quarterly, shippers can meet customer expectations even as external pressures rise.

APAC Shipping Trends and Q4 Outlook for Ocean Freight

Lock in capacity for Q4 now by securing a mix of annual and quarterly space commitments with multiple carriers and by aligning fulfillment calendars with the peak season.

march signals a turning point for APAC supply as northern Chinese gateways resume higher throughput and vietnam lanes accelerate. They drive shifts in willingness to allocate space, particularly on trans-Pacific and intra-APAC routes. generally, week-to-week variability remains, so close collaboration with partners and weekly demand reviews help prevent shortfalls in fulfillment windows. Those who diversify carriers and offer flexible appointment schedules tend to reduce delay exposure during the late march-to-April transition.

Agreements with Chinese and Vietnamese operators are tightening, shifting some balance toward shorter, more predictable sailings while preserving longer-term capacity where needed. The subject remains the risk of unexpected policy or port congestion impact, but early planning reduces these effects. With prices trending modestly lower into Q4, shippers who lock rates 6–9 weeks ahead typically achieve greater predictability and reduce unnatural spikes in cost for critical lanes.

Outlook and recommended actions for Q4 emphasize proactive capacity management, route diversification, and tighter execution discipline. Prioritize near-term space commitments on high-demand routes from northern China and Vietnam, while maintaining a flexible option set that includes alternative hubs like Indonesia and the Philippines. Use weekly S&OP cycles to adjust shipments, align with supplier fulfillment calendars, and negotiate short-term agreements that grant capacity holdovers during peak weeks. If global uncertainty remains elevated, invest in dynamic safety stock and pre-booked slots to protect service levels for popular lanes and time-sensitive markets.

Signal Q3 2025 baseline Q4 2025 outlook Opmerkingen
Throughput (YoY) 3–4% 4–6% Vietnam and northern China drive greater volumes; seasonality supports gains.
Vessel utilization 85–87% 82–85% Seasonal softness in late Q4 may ease congestion but requires early booking.
Freight rate index 980–1020 level 940–980 level Price pressure eases as supply grows; secure forward contracts to lock benefits.
Risks & uncertainty Moderate policy and port congestion risk Moderate to high depending on trade/energy moves Uncertainty remains around regulatory changes and macro shifts; adaptable plans win.

APAC Routes Volume and Lane Mix – May 2025 Snapshot

Prioritize converting offshore cargo to direct APAC routes in planning to capture volume growth: target shifting 12–18% of offshore volumes to direct lanes by mid-may, with a steady ramp in the weeks that follow.

Latest data show total APAC route volume rose 5% year-over-year in May, with direct lanes up 7% while offshore lanes grew 2% due to overcapacity in some corridors. December baseline volumes were 4% lower on average, so growth is meaningful, more than late-year levels; chinas routes led the way with a 6% increase, while other regions remained more steady.

The lane mix shifted toward direct services, now representing 48% of APAC cargo, up from 42% late last year; this aligns with planning for longer inland connections and reduces days in transit. Regions such as chinas, Southeast Asia, Japan, and Australia show good progress; continued investment in direct corridors supports a more resilient supply chains, even as offshore chains compress to maintain service levels.

respond to shifting demand with tighter inventory planning after peak seasons: monitor cargo to balance inventories and avoid stockouts, especially when lanes tighten or widen; the subject of cadence should be weekly planning cycles, with reviews every 2–3 weeks and a quick read on days and weeks indicators. Federal guidelines will influence peak-period routing, so adjust plans when regulatory checks rise; maintain flexibility to reallocate capacity within 7–14 days as needed.

Looking ahead, growth in APAC cargo will hinge on December comparisons and the latest shifts in demand; keeping offshore options as backup while expanding direct routes is good practice across regions to respond to volatility. Monitor days on key lanes and revise planning to avoid overcapacity pockets, ensuring a steady, cost-efficient flow through the summer and beyond.

Q4 2025 Ocean Freight Pricing Outlook for APAC

Lock in long-term pricing for key APAC corridors now, targeting Asia-Europe and Asia-North America routes, to cap volatility into Q4 2025 and protect customers from peak season spikes.

Pricing outlook for APAC freight on Asia-North America routes shows easing from the late-2024 peak, with base rates forecast to ease by 5-10% into Q4 2025. For 40-foot containers, typical rates may land in a band of $1,500-$1,950 per FEU, depending on carrier mix, service level, and port pair. 20-foot units will follow a similar trend with a smaller absolute delta. Time-bound contracts and fuel surcharge design will help preserve value for customers while maintaining carrier partnership stability. For america lanes, the same easing pattern applies.

On Asia-Europe (asia-europe) routes, higher capacity in late 2024/early 2025 eased tension, yet peak season charges persist. We forecast a 3-7% dip in baseline rates by Q4 2025, with some routes showing a bounce due to changing demand patterns from chinas manufacturing and re-shoring activity. Carriers will maintain service regularity, and long-term contracts can lock stable value even as quarterly rates shift.

insight from customers and sourcing teams shows the want for sustained budgeting and risk diversification. Alternative routing options help diversify risk. Such options include parallel hubs in Southeast Asia or the Middle East trade lanes, which provide cargo resilience and cost efficiency. This approach helps reduce exposure to any single port bottleneck while keeping asia-sourced cargo flowing smoothly.

Case studies support paired fixed-rate cores with flexible supplements as the best balance. For APAC, we recommend locking core lanes (asia-europe and asia-america) for 12- to 18-month terms and layering optional capacity on peak weeks. Customers should monitor indicators such as import volumes from asia, the pace of sourcing, and routes congestion to decide when to extend or adjust contracts. This long-term strategy supports stable cash flow and predictable shipping costs for higher-value cargo and customers across Asia.

In summary, the Q4 2025 outlook favors a balanced mix: ease in spot levels, sustained value through long-term coverage, and prudent use of alternative routes to mitigate regional volatility.

Port Congestion and Dwell Times in Major APAC Hubs

Port Congestion and Dwell Times in Major APAC Hubs

Recommendation: Align berthing windows and pre-clearance across APAC hubs to reduce dwell times and stabilize movement of cargo. Implement door-to-door planning with buffers and publish ETA windows within 24 hours. Maintain a regular update cadence to keep importers informed, subject to carrier schedules.

In May 2025, the update said that dwell times rose slightly in most hubs. The APAC average climbed to 3.8 days, up from 3.1 days a year earlier. The largest increases occurred at Shanghai and Ningbo-Zhoushan, while Singapore remained closer to parity with historical levels. There, they reported that congestion levels began to ease only after targeted adjustments to gate hours and yard staffing.

Key numbers by hub (average dwell days, indicative backlog):

  • Shanghai: 4.6 days; congestion index 82; throughput remained stable, though movement through the port slowed there.
  • Ningbo-Zhoushan: 4.1 days; backlogs in rail-to-yard transfers; federal and regional agencies pushed night-hour clearance slots to accelerate flow.
  • Singapore: 2.9 days; door-to-door movement improved due to extended gate hours and streamlined pre-clearance.
  • Busan: 3.3 days; feeder delays create a parallel queue for inbound and outbound cargo, but the importers reported steadier inbound supply.
  • Hong Kong: 3.8 days; subject to hinterland checks, with pilots gradually shifted to longer operating windows to support throughput.
  • Tokyo: 3.2 days; demand from importers remains resilient, aided by digital pre-clearance and streamlined inspections.

Drivers behind the pattern include elevated inbound demand, increased repositioning of empties, and schedules that enter tight berthing windows. Parallel bottlenecks in feeder services amplify dwell times, while some corridors have fallen in cost pressure as night operations gain traction. In several regions, regional collaboration and data sharing have helped maintain a more stable movement of goods through the network.

Mitigation and adjustment actions to consider now:

  • Coordinate berthing windows with carriers to reduce ship wait times by 10-25% within 6-8 weeks.
  • Introduce pre-clearance and automated checks to cut on-dock dwell by 0.5-1.5 days, varying by hub.
  • Expand night-hour slots at Singapore, Shanghai, and Busan to move cargo through without disrupting daytime operations.
  • Re-route export-heavy corridors to level regional peaks, mitigating peak-season pressure on single hubs.
  • Adopt door-to-door visibility tools so movement through the chain can be monitored and adjusted weekly.
  • Importers should build a 2-3 week buffer into annual plans to absorb occasional spikes in dwell times and maintain service levels.

Outcome expectations: these steps aim to deliver a more stable cycle across APAC hubs, reducing the subject risk of late deliveries for international trade. Supporting the regional flow, the approach should help regions maintain predictable door-to-door timelines and protect annual budgeting for high-demand product lines, particularly in consumer electronics and apparel.

Inventory Restocking Signals and APAC Demand Patterns

Prioritizing capacity in the next days for APAC replenishment aligns with measured restocking signals. In May 2025, america orders and pacific outbound flows are moving, with us-china dynamics shaping availability and west slots. peru supply streams join the mix, feeding fulfillment across APAC hubs. Plan into the system with clear ownership and planning cadence.

When demand comes, the most reliable signals come from days of coverage remaining and spot-fulfillment windows. Monitor inventory remaining in regional DCs and the release of orders from origin plants, as lead times tighten along the pacific corridor. Freighter capacity is tight during peak seasons; securing capacity alongside contract slots reduces risk. Spot-market movements and planned fulfillment windows should drive action when us-china flows shift. Most replenishment cycles occur within 14–21 days of a demand signal; adjust safety stock accordingly.

Managing capacity across america and APAC requires a disciplined approach to inventory planning and cross-region coordination within the system. Implement a unified system to convert demand signals into committed orders, with clear release milestones into the APAC network. Map routes from peru and west hubs to APAC to minimize days in transit and maximize fulfillment. Using measured KPIs, track days of stock, on-time fulfillment, and freighter utilization to fine-tune prioritizing and planning cycles.

Fuel Surcharges, Energy Costs, and Regulatory Impacts on APAC Shipments

Recommendation: implement a dynamic fuel surcharge framework aligned with the latest energy indices and announced regulations, with tracking dashboards for weekly updates, maintaining flexibility to adjust monthly. This approach keeps shippers informed and margins reliable across pacific hubs.

Fuel surcharges for APAC shipments currently range from 6% to 12% of base freight on most pacific lanes, with a 1.2 percentage point rise in the latest quarter. The latest data show bunker indices rising 4–5% month over month during peak season, driven by tighter supply and refinery outages. Keeping surcharges aligned with the energy index helps maintaining price stability and ensuring clearance at ports. Tracking these values weekly lets you adjust rates without lag, and generally there is a seasonal pattern where rates edge up in May and fall in autumn. There is value in a predictable quarterly cadence of updates as announced adjustments occur monthly, so shippers should monitor energy cost trends and regulatory updates.

Regulatory impacts: APAC governments have announced stricter sulfur rules and emissions limits for 2025, with added port dues and ballast water requirements. Regulations across countrys are shifting, creating additional clearance steps and potential delays if shipments miss checks. The season’s regulatory calendar requires carriers and forwarders to cooperate on document accuracy and fuel compliance. A reliable compliance program reduces dispatch delays and penalties, and weve integrated a pre-approval process to speed up clearance for compliant vessels and containers, helping shippers maintain schedule integrity.

Strategies for resilience: build a flexible surcharge policy tied to the latest announced regulations, keep a contingency line in budgets for energy cost volatility, and maintain monthly tracking of bunker price and energy indices. Use a 0.5 percentage threshold to trigger updates, which gives you stability without exposing margins to daily swings. Leverage diversification of pacific hubs and contract terms to smooth peaks in the season, and work with trusted partners to ensure reliable clearance. weve seen that collaborative planning with customers and carriers improves forecasting accuracy and helps maintaining service levels during volatility.